Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Excise Act

1034 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Munna Kumar @ Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Kumar (also known as Munna Yadav) was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly transporting 315 litres of country-made Mahua liquor on a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he had been …

Md. Jasim @ JasimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jasim, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 164.805 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized vehicles, and that the case was based …

Harinarayan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harinarayan Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 15.75 litres of liquor were reportedly recovered from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was …

Rohit PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rohit Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized …

Indrajeet MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Mukhiya, was charged under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and semi‑prepared liquor from a house that is part of a joint family. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his …

Vinod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vinod Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 292.050 litres of liquor from a warehouse and an auto. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …

Gautam MahtoversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Gautam Mahto applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged …

Niraj Tiwari @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Tiwari, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 5.04 litres of liquor and 1 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was merely an informer who led police to the contraband and that …

Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 184.59 litres of liquor from an auto. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …

Sunil Rai @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunil Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his property. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was …

Nagendra Yadav @ Ankit Yadav @ Anik yadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nitish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 350 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 146.885 litres of liquor from the house of Sohar Singh. The petitioner argued that he …

Meraj AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Meraj Alam, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 0.725 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior …

Kari yadav @ Amarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kari Yadav, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 74.460 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor …

Nandu Paswan @ Nandkishor PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nandu Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 39 litres of liquor from vacant land. The petitioner argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and the alleged …

Prahlad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prahlad Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi, the wife of Ramchandra Yadav, was implicated in an excise case after 120.960 litres of liquor were recovered from a car she owned. She applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession …

Naresh Kumar PoddarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar Poddar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his scooty. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was …

Manoj Chaudhary @ Manoj ChoudhryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 40 litres of country-made liquor and 800 kg of Jawa Mahua in a 2014 case under Sections 47(a) and (F) of the Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had no possession of the seized liquor, and possessed a …

Sablu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sablu Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 17.28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he had no prior criminal …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Niraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he did not own and that the case against him rests on a confessional statement …

Ajit MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ajit Mehta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from sacks near a canal. The petitioner claimed he was not arrested at the spot, that the …

Kishlal Mahto @ Krishnlal Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishlal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested …

Sangita Devi @ Sanjita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sangita Devi, a woman, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor. She argued that the liquor was recovered from a public place, she was not in possession, and the FIR does not name the informant, …

Shivam Kumar @ Shubhankar Yadav @ Shiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), (c), (d) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not have the seized vehicle in his possession, …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithalesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 78 litres of liquor from a corn field. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.345 litres of liquor from his grocery shop. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was …

Bikram Singh @ Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bikram Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of two litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …

Sanjay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a house and 70 litres from a public bush. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, the …

Raj Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a house and a public area. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a cowshed belonging to Vijay Yadav and from a scooty he owned. He has four prior criminal cases, one of which …

Manish Kumar OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar Ojha applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 17.64 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had sold the vehicle to Bejli Ram on 17 June 2025 and that an affidavit from Bejli Ram confirmed the …

Saheb Manjhi @ Sahib ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saheb Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a bush near his palani. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor …

Rajiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajiv Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 9.75 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered …

Manjhlu MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjhlu Marandi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that he …

Saroj SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 747 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested, had no possession of the liquor, …

Suresh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suresh Manjhi and Kishori Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of five litres of liquor each from their joint family house. …

Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Jhunnu @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 208.665 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from his residence. He contended that the liquor was stored in a …

Raju Prasad SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Prasad Sah, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 272, 273 and 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 9.9 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Munna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of eight litres of liquor from the Sone river. He argued that he was not in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public place, and the …

SURAJ MANDAL @ SURAJ KUMAR @ SURAJversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(e) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 125 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 36 and 41(1) of the Excise Act relating to the illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 4,437 litres recovered. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle …

Kishan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from PS Kuchaikote, Gopalganj. Petitioners' counsel requested withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application for petitioner No.1, Kishan Yadav, who had already been arrested; the court granted this withdrawal. The second …

Sona Devi @ Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sona Devi, a 62‑year‑old woman with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 492.480 litres of liquor from a vehicle. The …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 5,296.68 litres of liquor from three vehicles. The petitioner argued that he was not …

SHAILESH KUMAR @ SHAILESH KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailesh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 43.2 litres of liquor from a sack near a motorcycle that was seized. The petitioner argued he had no prior …

Murat Sah @ Ram Murat Sah @ Ram Murti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Murat Sah, also known as Ram Murti Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45.525 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested at the …

Jalim Ray @ Jalim RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jalim Ray applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 317(5), 51 and 52 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging recovery of 220.5 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner, who has three prior criminal cases (two under …

Law Kumar @ Love Kumar @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Law Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5 litres of codeine cough syrup recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean record, was not arrested at the spot, did not have conscious …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.25 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner claimed a clean …

SUBHASH KUMAR DAS @ SUBHASH DASversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the alleged incident occurred on premises …

Guddu Nut @ Guddu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Nut applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was recovered …

Pavan Yadav @ Pawan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pavan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 265 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and argues that the liquor was not recovered …

Santosh Nut @ Santosh NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Nut was accused under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from a public place. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record, no arrest, and no possession of the liquor, and claiming that the allegation stemmed from an inimical …

Sanni Singh @ Sanni Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanni Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 203.97 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was …

Bharat PasiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bharat Pasi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from various locations. The petitioner asserted that he had no prior criminal record, that …

Rajbanshi Paswan @ Rajbansh HajaraversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajbanshi Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he was not present at the spot of …

Hari Shankar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hari Shankar Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Sonu @ Md. SonuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that 32.22 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …

Vishwakarma MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwakarma Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was not the …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anand Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a site adjacent to his brick‑kiln and that he was not arrested or found in possession of the …

BHEEMA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bheema Ram, who was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 4,032 bottles of illegal foreign liquor and charged under several …

ABHISHEK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑06‑2021 and the proceedings of case No. 2576 of 2022 (State vs Vindhyachal et al.) arising from a 2018 offence under IPC sections 272, 273 and Excise Act sections 60, 72. The applicant alleged that no offence …

Dharmendra Sahni @ Dhawendra Sahni @ Dhari SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Sahni, was arrested in connection with an assault case (Naokothi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025) alleging injuries to Khusbu and Shobha Kumari under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The injuries were determined to be simple in nature, and the petitioner …

RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was in custody for Crime No. 171 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the IPC, alleging abduction and marriage of a girl who was claimed to be a minor. Ravi contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl was now his wife, …

MOHD INAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Inam under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that he was already on bail in two base cases and had a criminal history of six …

SURAJ MAHATOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj Mahato filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur, despite being on bail at the time. He contended that the warrant was issued without any prior summons or bailable warrant and that the …

Dev Rai @ Rajdev RaiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dev Rai, applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 880 litres of liquor from two kilns. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the premises did not …

Sanoj Rai @ Sanoj RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Rai, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 324 litres of liquor from a pickup van, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the owner of the …

Guddu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Sahani applied for regular bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 300 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor near a riverbank. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …

Bihans Bind @ Binans KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bihans Bind, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.375 litres of liquor from a public area. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged liquor was not in his possession and the …

Satyendra RajwanshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Rajwanshi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of five litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was …

Vijay Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Prasad Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 83.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle by …

Sujit Kumar Yadav @ Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He claimed the alleged contraband was …

Pinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Kumari applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10.620 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to her house. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was falsely implicated …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rohit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 99 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of raw jaggery. The petitioner argued that the seized …

Pundev RautversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pundev Raut, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was recovered from a …

Bittu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

SACHIN YADAV @ SACHIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 309.60 litres of liquor from an open field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …

Amarjit @ MithuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit @ Mithu, a resident of Muzaffarpur, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a vehicle and a mustard field. He contended …

Shailendra Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailendra Kumar Gupta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(d) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 kg of mahua flower from a motorcycle he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.46 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the …

Nagendra Kumar BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar Baitha, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging seizure of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a public orchard. He claimed a clean antecedent, no possession at the time of arrest, and that the complaint was filed by a …

Rishikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rishikesh Kumar and Amresh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 270 litres of liquor were recovered from a Maruti Suzuki car. They …

Bir Kumar @ Veer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.375 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious …

Niraj Choudhary @ Niranjan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …

Ramchal Yadav @ Ramchal Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramchal Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 274, 275, 132, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the case diary and his criminal antecedent report had not been produced, that he was …

Dharo ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharo Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and fermented fruit. He argued that the case diary and his …

Md. Suleman AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Suleman Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 39 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …

Brijesh Kumar @ Briesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Badhiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Badhiya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from her residence. The petitioner argued that the liquor was found in a joint family …

Sunil Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunil Kumar Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Rajji @ Rajji Khan @ Raji Ahmad @ raji ahmad khanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajji Khan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 750 ml of liquor and seizure of his motorcycle. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal antecedent and claimed he was not arrested at the scene, arguing …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and that …

Vivek Bharti @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Bharti applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the case was based solely on a …

Vikrama SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikrama Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 196 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of …

Ajay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ajay Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after being implicated in an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 542.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Upendra SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 2400 kg of semi‑prepared jawa mahua that were destroyed at a river bank. He …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a poultry farm and a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …

Ranjeet Saw @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Saw, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 36 and 56(c) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from Pappu Singh's premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, had no …

Dwarika MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dwarika Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging recovery of 31.17 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He contended that the liquor was not in his …

Shubhash Kumar @ Shubhash DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shubhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the allegation …

Dev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dev Kumar, a resident of Begusarai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 982.44 litres of liquor from a mini Tata truck. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not …

Deepak Kumar Yadav @ Dipak Yadav @ Deepak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 351 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …

Rambabu SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rambabu Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 501 litres of liquor from a straw house belonging to Krishna Mohan. The petitioner argued …

Pawan Kumar @ PawniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor near the Punpun river. He contended that he was not arrested at the …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …

Pawan Mahto @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …

Praveen KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a ghat. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had …

Ramchandra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramchandra Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public bridge area and 102 …

Abdhesh Yadav @ Avdesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abdhesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.250 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 120 litres of liquor were recovered from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had …

Bablu Singh @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a)(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and mahua. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was …

Govind Saw @ Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 23.6 litres of liquor from a public place behind a temple. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested …

Saroj ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 53.75 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the …

Bhola SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Binod Ram @ Binod Kumar Ram @ Vinod RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 69.6 litres of liquor from a cowshed adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …

Alok Kumar Singh @ Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Alok Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.875 litres of liquor from a toilet roof adjacent to his house. The petitioner asserted …

Arvind PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arvind Patel, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 13.92 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a public place, not in his possession, and that the police relied on secret …

Gopal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 62.625 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Sandesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of …

Umal RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umal Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his …

Jayprakash Ram @ Jay Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jayprakash Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 206.58 litres of liquor from a jointly …

Ajay Chaudhary @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Chaudhary, was implicated in G.O. Case No.558 of 2015 for alleged offences under Section 47(A)(F) of the Excise Act, with police seizing 300 kg of illicit liquor. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting that he is neither a licencee nor involved in the preparation of …

Prashant Kumar @ PaloversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Prashant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not arrested, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he denied ownership of the hut where …

Phoolbabu Kumar @ Phoolbabu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Phoolbabu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4.455 litres of liquor from a poultry farm. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was …

Lalan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lalan Singh petitioned the Patna High Court for regular bail in a case registered in 2000 under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act. He had previously been released on bail in 2001, but the bail was cancelled in 2003, a non‑bailable warrant was issued and he was …

RATAN MANDALversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ratan Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi, the wife of Ramesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 13.5 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. The petitioner argued that she had …

Rahul Choudhary @ Rahul Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 139.2 litres of liquor from a room in a line hotel. The petitioner asserted that …

Kavita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kavita Kumari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in conscious …

Bhutay Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav @ Bhutaya YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bhutay Yadav and Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued they have clean antecedents, …

Harendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harendra Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Chinta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chinta Devi, the widow of the late Arjun Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor and 200 litres of mahua from a public place (palani). …

Satrudhan Yadav @ Satrughan Yadav @ Lucky YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satrudhan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 111.750 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner, who has five prior criminal cases, argued …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of …

Prem SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Sahani and Sanjay Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor and 200 litres of semi‑prepared jawa mahua, which were later destroyed. The petitioners claimed they had no …

Nagendra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nagendra Mukhiya and Shatrudhan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 172.8 litres of liquor from a place adjacent to the second petitioner's house. They contended that they had no conscious possession of …

Bikesh Yadav @ Vikesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his semi‑constructed house. The petitioner …

Dinesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60.840 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …

Vijay Kant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Kant Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 2.880 litres of liquor on his scooty. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor at the time …

Nilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 111(i) and 111(ii) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(2) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,075.68 litres of liquor from a Mahindra …

Sakila KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sakila Khatoon, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where 47.115 litres of liquor were seized from an auto she owned, alleged to be a violation of Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present …

Kundan Singh @ Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found …

Ramakant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramakant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR omitted the name of the …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a straw house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no …

Kittu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kittu Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …

Hiradayal Sah @ Hira Dayal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered for offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishal Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 67.5 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a vehicle, and charged under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Excise Act. He applied for bail, contending that nothing was recovered from his personal possession and that the police had …

Mithu Kumar Mandal @ Nitish Kumar Mandal @ MithuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithu Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24.09 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Jhapasi Manjhi @ Jhapshi ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jhapasi Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 56(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …

Chinta Haran SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where recovery of 449.28 litres of liquor was reported from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …

Ramu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramu Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and …

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 8.56 litres of liquor from land jointly owned with Devendra Yadav. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Pintu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14 litres of liquor near his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Ashok Kumar @ Bullet SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.92 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner argued that the …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.28 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the liquor was …

Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjay Yadav and Ghamandi Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and jawa mahua near the Sone river. They …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor near his agricultural land. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …

Puja KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Puja Kumari applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a location behind a hut. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Sunil SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and semi‑prepared spirits from a public jungle area. He asserted that he has …

Mannu @ Abhimanyu @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 13.58 litres of liquor from his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not …

Lal Mohan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Mohan Rai, had been granted anticipatory bail on 20 April 2026. He later pointed out that the order incorrectly stated that he had nine pending cases under the Excise Act, whereas the application disclosed eleven such cases. He sought a modification of paragraphs 3 and 6 of the …

Lalan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parwati Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging recovery of 229.725 litres of liquor from two vehicles, invoking Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was not in …

Jitendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Jitendra Chaudhary and Rohit Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 47.7 litres of liquor. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Ravi Ranjan Manjhi @ Ravi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 304(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 41(c), 33 and 34 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized Scorpio, and was …

Nirdosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nirdosh Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 84 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, claiming he was implicated by …

Bhadru @ Badaru Paswan @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhadru Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act and Sections 8(c), 21(b), 8 and 20(B)(II)A of the NDPS Act for alleged recovery of 15.20 grams of smack, 2.81 grams of ganja and 6 litres of liquor from another person, Chandra …

Biranj Chaudhary @ Viran ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biranj Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 205 litres of liquor and 100 litres of jaggery solution from two locations. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Sipahi Ray @ Sipahi Kumar@ Shipahi RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sipahi Ray, a resident of Baramahpur, was arrested on 24 November 2025 in connection with offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. An earlier bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the court allowing a fresh application after the charges were framed on 25 February 2026. The …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rahul Kumar and Moti Tamoli applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a ruin near their house. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in their conscious possession, and …

Umesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four accused persons, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 514 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. Petitioners No.1, 2 and 3 claimed they had clean antecedents and were merely passengers unaware of the cargo, …

Bhuar TurhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhuar Turha, was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor or the vehicle and that the complaint was based on the testimony …

Pappu Sahani @ AppuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pappu Sahani and Dhanik Lal Sahani, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, were not arrested at the spot, did not have the …

SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Saroj Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 235.815 litres of liquor from a Tata Indica car, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner, who has twelve prior excise cases, claimed he was not the owner of the car, was not arrested at the spot, and was implicated by a …

Raja Singh @ Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Singh was arrested in connection with alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from various locations, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the seized liquor was not on his premises, and he was implicated solely on secret information. …

Bagha @ Akhilesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bagha @ Akhilesh Mukhiya was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 168 litres of liquor, based primarily on a confessional statement of another person in police custody. The petitioner, who has six prior Excise cases, was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was …

Kanchan Kumar Nishad @ Kanchan NishadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Nishad, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 3,372.84 litres of liquor from a truck he owned, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …

Ajit Rai @ Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 600 litres of liquor and 6000 litres of fermented jawa mahua from the Ganga river. …

Bharat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bharat Kumar and Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an excise case alleging recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck, invoking Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …

Ranjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean …

Golu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Gandak river. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that …

Kariman Rai @ Amrendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kariman Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He claimed that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Santosh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a sack behind his house, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Sahni @ Deepak ShahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from Bajraha Tola. He has three prior cases, two of which are also under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 27 January 2026. The petitioner argued that he was …

Arjun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Rai was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to alleged possession of liquor seized from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the …