Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted, subject to a cash bond, two sureties and a condition allowing cancellation if the trial is delayed.

Summary

Sudhir Kumar was arrested on 25 February 2026 in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act and Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was rejected on 4 May 2026, with liberty to re‑apply after charge‑framing. The petitioner, represented by counsel, argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the charges have now been framed. The State opposed the bail. The Court considered the submissions and directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a cash bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties of the same amount, one of whom must be his father, Vishundev Yadav. The bail was granted subject to the condition that the trial court may cancel the bail if it finds the petitioner attempting to delay the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act and Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the framing of charges justify the grant of bail after a prior rejection.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Excise Act
  • NDPS Act
  • high court
  • surety
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41254 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2025 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Sudhir Kumar S/O-Vishundev Yadav @ Bishundev Yadav Resident of
                 village-Lakhni, PS- Mahishi, District-Saharsa

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra
                                                   Ms. Isha Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act

                   and Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act.

                                 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2026 and is a person with

                   clean antecedent. It is next submitted that petitioner had earlier

                   moved before this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc.

                   No.29648 of 2026 and the same came to be rejected by an order

                   dated 04.05.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer

                   for bail after framing of charge.

                                 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41254 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                           2/2




                         18.05.2026, as would manifest from Annexure-P/4 to the regular

                         bail application.

                                      5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

                                      6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                         counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-

                         named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-

                         bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand)

                         with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                         learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with

                         Special NDPS Case No.09 of 2026 arising out of Mahishi P. S.

                         Case No.272 of 2025, with a condition that one of the bailors of

                         the petitioner shall be his father namely, Vishundev Yadav @

                         Bishundev Yadav.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.

                                      8. It is further made clear that if the learned trial court

                         comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to

                         delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned trial court

                         shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                         recording reasons.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.