Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving theft of a vehicle, a stolen motorcycle, and illegal arms, alleged under Sections 111 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He claimed that the vehicle was owned by his brother and that he was falsely implicated, while noting he has four prior criminal cases under the Electricity Act, Excise Act and the IPC. The State opposed his bail application. The Patna High Court, noting the lack of any material recovered directly from the petitioner, decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, emphasizing that its observations were prima facie and not to affect the trial. The order released the petitioner on bail pending further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • theft
  • arms possession
  • prior criminal antecedents
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34342 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2026 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Jitendra Kumar S/O - Late Dilip Yadav R/O Vill - Rikabganj, P.S - Malsalami,
                 Dist- Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through video conferencing.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Alamganj P.S. Case No. 136 of 2026 instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 111/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and

                   sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The allegation is that four persons were caught with

                   a vehicle. Upon sustained interrogation, one of them disclosed

                   his name as Jitendra Kumar i.e. the present petitioner.

                   Thereafter, a stolen motorcycle was recovered. Thereafter, on

                   further confession of accused Badal Kumar, arms were

                   recovered. From the possession of the petitioner, a smart phone
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34342 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                            2/3




          and Nissan car were recovered.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. Counsel states that he is the owner of the vehicle

          and it is registered in the name of his brother and the same has

          no connection with the crime. Counsel submits that the

          petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2026, having four criminal

          antecedents, out of which, two cases are registered under

          Electricity Act, one case is registered under Excise Act and one

          case is registered under I.P.C.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the absence of any recovery from the

          petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial

          Magistrate-VI, Patna City, in connection with Alamganj P.S.

          Case No. 136 of 2026.

                       8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

          prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

          adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34342 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                       and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                       manner.



                                                                            (Ansul, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.