Patna High Court
Niraj Gupta @ Niraj SaoversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond, sureties and statutory conditions.
Summary
The petitioners, Niraj Gupta and Thakur Ritesh Kumar, feared arrest in a 2019 case (PS 137) involving alleged assault and property damage, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 308, 504 and 34. Although the offences were initially bailable, a charge‑sheet was filed in 2023 and their earlier anticipatory bail application was rejected. They filed a fresh anticipatory bail petition, arguing clean antecedents, cooperation with investigation, and that co‑accused Rajesh Kumar had been granted anticipatory bail in a similar matter (Cr. Misc. No.84853 of 2025). The State opposed the relief. The Court, noting the earlier order and the petitioners' willingness to cooperate, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs 10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC/482(2) B.N.S.S., reserving the right to cancel bail if they delay the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail despite the filing of a charge‑sheet and the nature of the offences.
- Whether the earlier grant of anticipatory bail to a co‑accused influences the decision in the present petition.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 41, 438, 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 308, 323, 34, 341, 504
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Indian Penal Code
- Criminal Procedure Code
- bailable offences
- charge‑sheet
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37894 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
======================================================
1. Niraj Gupta @ Niraj Sao Son of Surendra Singh @ Surendra Sao Resident
of Village Rupaspur, Dhanaut, P.S. Rupaspur, Dist Patna
2. Thakur @ Ritesh Kumar Son of Shyam Nandan Sharama Resident of
Village - Near Government School Jhojhi, P.S.- Nagarnausa, Nalanda at
Present Village - Gola Road, More Rupaspur, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dineshwar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 23-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308,
504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant
alleges that on 11.03.2019 Niraj (petitioner no. 1), Rajesh and his
staff assaulted him by khanti and brick on account of which he
received injury on his shoulder and they also broke the glass of his
shop.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
initially when the FIR was instituted, the same was instituted under
Sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, as such, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37894 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
2/3
offences were bailable but under wrong legal advice A.B.P. No. 2415
of 2019 was filed by the petitioners and the same came to be rejected
by an order dated 24.06.2019. It is further submitted that thereafter
the police issued notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. and the
petitioners cooperated in the investigation, as such, the police never
felt the need of arresting the petitioners but then charge-sheet came to
be submitted under Sections 341, 323, 308 and 504 and 34 of the
Indian Penal Code on 27.09.2023 thereafter cognizance was taken, as
such, the petitioners apprehended their arrest, hence, filed the instant
anticipatory bail application which came to be rejected and is
impugned in the instant anticipatory bail application. It is next
submitted that when the police, during the course of investigaiton,
never made any efforts to arrest the petitioners, whether it would be
prudent for the Court to send the petitioners to jail based on an order
of cognizance. It is also submitted that similarly situated co-accused,
namely, Rajesh Kumar had approached this Court seeking
anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 84853 of 2025 and the same
came to be allowed vide order dated 20.02.2026 passed by a learned
Coordinate Bench of this Court. It is also submitted that if the
privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners, the
petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation
to prove their innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the
prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37894 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
3/3
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and taking into
consideration the order dated 20.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.
84853 of 2025, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their
arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/Successor Court in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.
137 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court
comes to a conclusion that petitioners, after their release on
anticipatory bail, are trying to delay the framing of charge or after
framing of charge are trying to delay the trial of the case in any
manner, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail
bonds of the petitioners.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.