Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramnath MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramnath Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 70 litres of liquor recovered from a public place. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no incriminating article in his possession, and possessed no prior criminal record. The prosecution opposed bail, while the petitioner argued that the recovery was from an open area and that Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, had not been complied with. The court examined the facts, the length of custody since 21‑11‑2025, and the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner. Concluding that the circumstances did not justify continued detention, the court granted bail on the condition of a Rs.15,000 bond with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the facts of the case.
  • Whether the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103
  • Bihar
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3839 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2025 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Ramnath Mahto S/O Kishan Mahto R/O Vill.- Bara Hasanpur,P.S-
                 Khushrupur,Dist-Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Anirudh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Khusrupur P.S. Case No. 464 of 2025 instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 70 litres

                   of liquor has been recovered from plastic sack.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No

                   incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made

                   from an open place which is accessible to public at large. The
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3839 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of

                     liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2025 and has no

                     criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of

                     the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                     the case as also the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case

                     No. 464 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.