Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunil TantiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, directing release upon bond and sureties if arrested within six weeks.

Summary

The petitioners, Sunil Tanti and Kundan Tanti, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging they created a ruckus during a religious immersion and assaulted police. They contend they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant, having merely arrived at the scene out of curiosity. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court considered the petitioners' clean record, the nature of the allegations, and the provisions of Section 482(2) for granting bail. It ordered that, if arrested within six weeks, the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. The anticipatory bail application was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the provisions of Section 482(2) in view of the allegations under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 132, 125(a), 125(b), 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • BNS 2023
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38450 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sunil Tanti son of Kartik Tanti Resident Of Village- Chandramandi, Ps-
                  Chandramandi, Dist- Jamui
           2.     Kundan Tanti @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Tanti Son of Shyam
                  Sundar Tanti Resident Of Village- Chandramandi, Ps- Chandramandi, Dist-
                  Jamui
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-06-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190,

                   126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 132, 125(a), 125(b), 351(2)

                   and 352 of the BNS, 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant

                   alleges that during immersion of goddess Saraswati, the accused

                   persons including the petitioners created ruckus and pelted stones

                   at the police force and four named accused persons got arrested

                   and rest fled and their names transpired based on video footage

                   and from rural sources.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38450 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      informant, it is next submitted that petitioners are resident of a

                      place nearby to the place of occurrence and when ruckus was

                      created, they out of inquisitiveness came to the place of occurrence

                      and came to be implicated. It is reiterated and submitted that

                      petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory

                      bail application of the petitioners.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the

                      event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from

                      today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

                      Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

                      like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with

                      Chandramandi P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026 subject to the conditions

                      as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

                                   7. Accordingly,        the     instant   anticipatory   bail

                      application is allowed.



                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.