Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Karan Kumar @ Karan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The bail application was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, was charged with gang rape of a minor under Section 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The charge was framed on 13 October 2025, but no witness had been examined in the trial up to the date of the bail hearing. The petitioner sought bail for the second time after an earlier application was rejected on 8 September 2025. The court noted the gravity of the offence and the lack of trial progress, and consequently dismissed the bail application. The court directed the Special Judge (POCSO) to expedite the trial and instructed the Superintendent of Police to ensure witness attendance, and ordered the order to be communicated to the relevant authorities.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a gang rape case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act given the seriousness of the offence and the stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • gang rape
  • POCSO
  • criminal procedure
  • trial delay
  • witness attendance

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38641 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Karan Kumar @ Karan Kumar Sah R/o vill- Bhikari Sah @ Bhikhan Sah R/o
                 Village-Pirauna ,P.S- Garkha thana , Dist- Saran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X D/o ABC R/o Village- Pirari bind ,P.S- Derni, Dist-Saran

                                                         ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                  2.        This is the second attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case

                   No.358 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 4

                   and 6 of the Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act.

                   Earlier, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail has been

                   rejected by this Court vide order dated 08.09.2025 passed in

                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.60414 of 2025.

                                  3.        As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   accused of committing gang rape with the victim girl.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38641 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                                      2/2




                                    4.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that in this case the charge has been framed on 13.10.2025 but

                    no witness has been examined in the trial till date.

                                    5.      Considering the gravity of offence, I am not

                    inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present

                    bail application stands dismissed.

                                    6.      The Special Judge (POCSO), Saran is

                    directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as

                    possible.

                                    7.      The Superintendent of Police, Saran is

                    directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses in the trial.

                                    8.      Let a copy of this order be communicated to

                    the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saran as well as the

                    Superintendent of Police, Saran forthwith through FAX or e-

                    mail for its compliance.


                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)


pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.