Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rina DeviversusThe Sate of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail as a prima facie case exists.

Summary

Rina Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7 litres of illicit liquor recovered from bushes, an open public area. She applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting that she was innocent and that the liquor could have been accessed by anyone. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, after reviewing the FIR and the circumstances of the recovery, held that a prima facie case existed for granting bail. Accordingly, the court ordered her release on pre‑arrest bail, subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal amount, and verification of her criminal antecedents. The bail order would lapse if she is found to have other pending cases.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the fact that the illicit liquor was recovered from an open public space affects the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • bail conditions
  • open public space
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38723 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2026 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Rina Devi W/O Mokhatar Mahato R/O Village - Rampur Rudra, P.S- Panapur,
                 District - Saran at Chhapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The Sate of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Vijaya Laxmi Srivastawa, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Asha Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Panapur P.S. Case No. 187/2026 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 7 litres of

                   illicit liquor was recovered from the bushes.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further

                   submitted that recovery of illicit liquor has been made from

                   the bushes which is an open space and is easily accessible by

                   anyone. Petitioner has no concern either with the place of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38723 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          recovery or with the alleged sized liquor.

                        5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                       6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf

          of the parties and upon perusal of the allegations made in the

          FIR, coupled with the fact that the alleged recovery of illicit

          liquor was effected from the bushes, which is an open space and

          easily accessible by anyone, I am of the opinion that petitioner,

          has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest

          bail.

                       7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be

          released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender

          before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned          Concerned Court where the case is

          pending in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 187/2026,

          subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

          the BNSS.

                       8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the

          criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the

          petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38723 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will

                     automatically lose its force.


                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)

Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.