Patna High Court
Ashutosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to verification of his criminal antecedent and compliance with the stipulated conditions.
Summary
Ashutosh Kumar, a resident of Nalanda district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 324(3) (426 IPC), 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 62.49 litres of liquor from his rented premises. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, claiming he was falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs.500 with two sureties and subject to verification of the petitioner’s antecedent. The order stipulated that if any prior case is discovered, the bail would not be confirmed; otherwise, it would be confirmed immediately. The decision was based on the provisions of Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. given the alleged offences.
- Whether the petitioner’s claim of a clean antecedent warrants the grant of provisional anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act — s. 111(3), 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 324(3), 426
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- clean antecedent
- liquor seizure
- excise law
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38948 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE HILSA District- Nalanda
======================================================
Ashutosh Kumar Son of Dhiraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Bind Resident of Village-
Khaddi Lodipur, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 18-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324(3)
(426 IPC), and 111(3) of the BNS as well as Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 62.490 litres of liquor from rented room of the
petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and has been falsely
implicated in the instant case with an allegation that the liquor
was recovered from his rented room when the liquor was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38948 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
2/3
recovered from the house of the landlord but then at the instance
of the local person, petitioner was implicated in the instant case,
when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,
above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a
period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees
Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/Successor Court in connection with Hilsa Excise P.S.
Case No. 41 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned
Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner
and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case,
it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his
antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail
application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38948 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
3/3
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the
provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.