Patna High Court
Md Affzal HussainversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to bond, sureties, and verification of antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Md Affzal Hussain, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 119.20 litres of liquor recovered from a pickup vehicle he owned, invoking Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession at the time of seizure, and was unaware of his driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.500 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., pending verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent. If any antecedent is found, the bail may be revoked; otherwise, it will be confirmed. The order reflects the Court’s discretion to balance the petitioner’s rights against the seriousness of the alleged offences.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of alleged liquor possession.
- Whether the petitioner’s lack of direct possession and clean antecedent justify bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 272, 273
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- liquor seizure
- IPC 272
- IPC 273
- Bihar Prohibition Act
- Criminal Procedure Code
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39082 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2024 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Md Affzal Hussain S/O Abdul Gaffar R/O Vill.- Near Jabbar Masjid Karim
Ganj, Wasseypur, P.S.- Dhanbad, Distt.- Jharkhand
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Priya, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 29-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and
273 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 119.20 litres of liquor from a pick-up vehilce.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted
that petitioner came to be implicated based on the fact that he is
owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent
person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39082 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
2/3
and, thus, would create evidence against himself and, hence,
would get implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner was
completely unaware that his driver would misuse the vehicle in
the manner as alleged who also fled from the spot.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,
above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a
period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees
Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/Successor Court in connection with Bibhutipur P.S.
Case No. 53 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned
Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner
and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case,
it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his
antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail
application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39082 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
3/3
shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the
provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.