Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shabir Khan @ SabirversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing his release upon furnishing the prescribed bond and sureties.

Summary

Shabir Khan was named in an FIR (Shikarpur PS Case No. 969 of 2025) for offences including assault, intimidation and a demand for Rs. 50,000, allegedly arising from a land dispute. The petitioner argued that the FIR was false, filed 45 days after the alleged incident without justification, and that the charges were vague and intended to aggravate the dispute. The State opposed the bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner's involvement in other criminal cases. The court noted the delay in lodging the FIR and the general, omnibus nature of the assault allegation, finding these factors sufficient to grant bail. Accordingly, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Criminal Procedure Code.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay of 45 days in filing the FIR and the general nature of the assault allegation justify granting bail to the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner's involvement in other criminal cases precludes bail in the present matter.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false FIR
  • land dispute
  • delay in filing FIR
  • general allegation
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39542 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-969 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Shabir Khan @ Sabir Son of Jalil Khan Resident of Village - Bhudhava
                 Champapur, P.S.- Shikarpur, District - West Champaran.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Binod Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   18-06-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case

                   No. 969 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(3), 74, 140, 352, 351(2) and 3(5)

                   of the BNS.

                                3. The allegation against petitioner is to assault

                   informant and his son and also to ask for ransom of Rs.

                   50,000/-.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that present false case was lodged in the

                   background of land dispute between the parties for which the

                   separate proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. is pending. It is

                   pointed out that allegation of assault is only to aggravate the

                   allegations. It is further argued that present case was lodged

                   after 45 days of the occurrence without any just explanation,
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39542 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                                           2/2




                         which also suggests false implication on its face. It is also pointed

                         out that allegation of physical assault is appearing very much

                         general and omnibus against this petitioner. While concluding

                         arguments, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in four

                         more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

                                         5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                                         6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                         taking note of fact as allegation qua physical assault is appearing

                         very much general and omnibus in nature, coupled with the fact

                         that FIR in issue was lodged with delay of 45 days without any

                         just explanation, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the

                         event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

                         period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail,

                         furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

                         two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                         learned CJM, Bettiah, West Champaran/concerned Court, where

                         the case is pending in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No.

                         969 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                         Section 482(2) of BNSS.


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.