Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
32 judgments · newest first · showing 1–32
The petitioner, Md. Nurul, was implicated in a case under Sections 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from a pickup vehicle and a truck he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his immediate …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant with a sickle, alleged to cause head injuries and intent to cause death, invoking several sections of the BNS. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that the …
Mithleshiya Devi, an aunt, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the POCSO Act, 2012. The FIR alleged that her nephew Abhishek posted obscene videos of his daughter, threatened her, and that she had …
Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.55 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the …
Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.55 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the …
Amarjit Ray and Shiv Vinay Ray were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant with a farsa, allegedly intending to cause death. The petitioners argued the incident was a mutual fight with only simple injuries and denied any intent to kill. The prosecution presented a medical report showing five …
The petitioner, Luv Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant, his family, and co‑accused, as well as an alleged outrage of modesty, under multiple sections of the BNS. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the assault allegations were vague and general, that the injury to the …
Shabir Khan was named in an FIR (Shikarpur PS Case No. 969 of 2025) for offences including assault, intimidation and a demand for Rs. 50,000, allegedly arising from a land dispute. The petitioner argued that the FIR was false, filed 45 days after the alleged incident without justification, and that …
The petitioner, Kunti Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 26 litres of liquor at her residence and 18 litres at another house. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was stored in joint family property, she had no …
Piyush Kumar was named in an FIR (Case No. 11 of 2026) for alleged offences under Sections 132, 121(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, purportedly for behaving indecently with a lady constable during a vehicle check on 5 January 2026. The petitioner contended that the FIR did not contain any …
The appellants, Aprendra and Harendra Ray, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman and her husband, claiming caste-based motive. They contended that the allegations were exaggerated and stemmed from a land dispute, …
The petitioners, five brothers, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for alleged assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and other offences arising from a dispute over a land transaction. They sought pre‑arrest bail, contending that the dispute was purely civil, stemming from …
The petitioner, Athar Ali, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 64 of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, alleging that he had married the informant’s daughter by Nikah and was willing to keep her with …
The petitioner, Shiv Shankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 930 ml of liquor from a road near Jaiprakash’s house. He asserted a clean …
The petitioner, Soni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a public area near the Dhoba river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …
Mahesh Mishra, the owner of a motorcycle from which 171 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being carried, that the vehicle …
The appellant, Rakesh Singh, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Bihar National Security Act for alleged assault and theft. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. On appeal, the …
The petitioner, Md. Aijaj, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS No. 87 of 2025) alleging kidnapping, assault, and attempted outrage of modesty, with charges under several sections of the BNS. He claimed innocence, asserting that the specific allegation against him – that he fired a weapon – …
Bedami Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that her friend misused her vehicle. …
The petitioners, Chandan and Kishan Chaudhary, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with intent to kill arising from a land dispute with the informant. They contended that the incident was a mutual fight and that any injuries caused were in self‑defence without intent to kill. The State opposed …
The petitioners, Amit Kumar and Surendra Yadav, were implicated in Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 for assaulting and outraging the modesty of Usha Kumari under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Sexual Offences Act, 2023. They argued that they were falsely implicated because of a long‑standing …
The petitioners (Bablu Kumar, Gopal Singh, Bittu Kumar) sought anticipatory bail in connection with a police case (Baniyapur PS Case No. 533/2024) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. They argued that the FIR did not specifically allege their involvement, the …
The petitioners—Rana Yadav, Nitish Kumar and Suraj Yadav—were arrested in connection with a Kasim Bazar police case alleging assault with lathi, robbery of Rs.5,000 and possession of a firearm, invoking several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the case was …
The petitioners, Sunil Singh and Pankaj Kumar, applied for bail in connection with a criminal case (Mahua PS Case No.333 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved alleged firing on the night of …
The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications arising from FIR No.142/2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR described Heera Paswan firing at an informant, injuring two persons, and fleeing the …
Panchanand Sah was implicated in an FIR alleging assault with a lathi on the informant's wife, resulting in head injuries. The petitioner claimed false implication, noting a family dispute and a case‑and‑counter‑case with only simple injury to the informant's side and a clean antecedent. The State …
The petitioners, four residents of Rampatti village, were implicated in a case arising from an altercation at a Tazia fair on disputed land, where an informant alleged they assaulted him for video‑recording women. The petitioners contend they have clean antecedents (except two with a prior case) and …
Baljit Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47A and F of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915, read with Section 98(2)(3)(4) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of liquor from his house. He argued that the liquor …
The appellants, four Yadavs from Karwayan village, were charged under several sections of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant at his house. The Special Judge refused …
The petitioner, Sunny Deoal, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 303(2) of the BNS for alleged theft of a motorcycle. The FIR alleged that the informant's motorcycle was stolen and later recovered from co‑accused Deepak Kumar, whose confessional statement implicated the …
The petitioners, three brothers employed as laborers and masons under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojna, were implicated in a FIR alleging arson and attempted murder stemming from a labour‑charge dispute with the informant. They contended that the house in question was being constructed improperly and …
The petitioner, Ajay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code (191(2), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 132, 121(2), 109 and 121(1)). The FIR alleged that a group, including the petitioner, scuffled with …
