Patna High Court
Bandhan KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, sureties and verification of antecedent.
Summary
Bandhan Kumari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 190, 132, 121(1) and 263 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from her brother Gautam's house. The petitioner, a woman with a clean antecedent, argued that she was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in her possession, and the only link to her was her brother's confessional statement made while in police custody, which she contended lacks evidentiary value. The State opposed the anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.500 and two sureties, invoking Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., and conditioned the order on verification of the petitioner’s antecedent by the trial court.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. given the nature of the allegations.
- Whether the brother's confessional statement made in police custody can be the basis for implicating the petitioner.
- Whether the absence of possession and clean antecedent justify granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act — s. 121(1), 132, 190, 263
- Bihar Narcotic Substances (Special) Act — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a), 45
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- confessional statement
- possession
- clean antecedent
- gender
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39804 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
======================================================
Bandhan Kumari Daughter of Achchhelel Sahni Resident of Village-
Bhagwatpur, Dharampur, P.S. and District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janardan Prasad Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 30-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 132, 121(1) and 263
of the BNS as well as Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and
allegation is of recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the house of
Gautam.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was
recovered from her conscious possession and she came to be
implicated based on the confessional statement of her brother,
namely, Gautam in police custody which does not have any
evidentiary value in the eye of law.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39804 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
2/2
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,
above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period
of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail
on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection
with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned
Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and
if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it would
be presumed that petitioner had concealed her antecedent before this
Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the
provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is
found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent
in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be
confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.