Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lata DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners, holding that the primary charge is against the main accused and the petitioners' involvement is merely familial.

Summary

The petitioners – Lata Devi and her sons Sintu and Ashish – were named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping a 16‑year‑old girl with the intent of illicit intercourse or marriage, under Sections 96, 137(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that they were implicated only because they are relatives of the main accused, Abhishek Sharma, and that the case was false, filed due to a love dispute. The State opposed their bail application. The court observed that the primary allegation was against Abhishek Sharma and the petitioners’ involvement appeared merely as family members, noting their clean antecedents. Consequently, the court ordered their release on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail order effectively disposes of the petition for bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail under Section 438 CrPC in view of the allegations under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute a false case arising from a personal dispute.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false case
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • family members
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40076 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2026 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Lata Devi W/O Bablu Sharma R/O Village - Karnave, ward No 14, PS -
                  Banka, Distt- Banka
           2.    Sintu Sharma @ Sintu Kumar S/O Bablu Sharma R/O Village-
                 Karnave,Ward no 14, PS- Banka, Distt- Banka
           3.    Ashish Kumar @ Ashish Sharma S/O Bablu Sharma R/O Village-
                 Karnave,Ward no 14, PS- Banka, Distt- Banka

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :         Mr. Shashi Saurabh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR

                   and apprehending their arrest in connection with Parbatta

                   P.S Case No.96 of 2026 registered under Sections 96,

                   137(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

                   (in short ‘BNS’).

                               3. As per FIR, the minor daughter of informant

                   aged about 16 years was kidnapped by co-accused persons

                   including       petitioners        for       the     purpose         of     illicit
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40076 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




          intercourse/marriage with another person.

                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

          petitioners that the petitioners were implicated with the

          present crime in question only for the reason that the

          petitioner no.1 is the mother and petitioner no.2 and 3 are

          the brother of main accused namely, Abhishek Sharma, with

          whom the minor daughter of informant was in love. It is

          submitted as love was not approved by informant, the

          present false case was lodged, implicating entire family

          members including petitioners. Petitioners claimed clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact, as the thrust of allegation appears

          against co-accused Abhishek Sharma, where implication of

          these petitioners appears being mother and brother of main

          co-accused, accordingly, all above-named petitioners are

          directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks,

          on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40076 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to

                         the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M 1st, Khagaria            in

                         connection with P.S Case No.96 of 2026, subject to the

                         conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                         CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.




aniket/-                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.