Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhikhari ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, directing release on bail if arrested, subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhikhari Manjhi and Pramod Manjhi, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 10 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a bush near their house. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious physical possession and that they have a clean antecedent. The State opposed their anticipatory bail application. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not appear to be from the petitioners' conscious possession. Considering their clean antecedent, the court directed that they be released on bail if arrested or surrendered, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each, under the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order effectively granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged illicit liquor is not in the conscious physical possession of the accused.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent warrants the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
  • Whether the nature of the offence under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act precludes anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40121 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2026 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bhikhari Manjhi S/O Late Poshan Manjhi R/O Vill.- Majurahan, P.S.-
                  Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran
           2.     Pramod Manjhi S/O Late Poshan Manjhi R/O Vill.- Majurahan, P.S.-
                  Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran
                                                                     ... ... Petitioners
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ramakant Yadav,Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Shaheen Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026              Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                            2. Both accused/petitioners are named in the FIR and

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Raghunathpur P.S.

                   Case No. 83 of 2026 registered for the offence under Section

                   30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                            3. Allegation against the petitioners is to engage in illegal

                   trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is recovery of

                   10 liters of country-made liquor.

                            4. It is submitted by learned counsel that illicit liquor was

                   recovered from bush grown beside the House of these

                   petitioners, which is an open place and accessible by general

                   public, sufficiently suggesting that the recovery was not made
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40121 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                           2/2




                         from conscious physical possession of the petitioners.

                         Petitioners claimed clean antecedent.

                                  5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail of

                         the petitioners.

                                  6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking

                         note of fact as recovery of alleged country-made liquor prima

                         facie not appears to be made from conscious physical

                         possession of these petitioners, accordingly, both above-named

                         petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are directed to be

                         released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the

                         court below within a period of four weeks, on furnishing bail

                         bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two

                         sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                         Exclusive Special Judge Excise Court No.-1, Motihari, District-

                         East Champaran in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case

                         No.83 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                         Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                                       (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
aniket/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.