Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikrama SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that the seizure did not establish conscious possession.

Summary

Vikrama Sahani was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 56 litres seized from an open area. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the seizure was made from a public place, seeking anticipatory bail. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The court examined the facts and noted the lack of direct possession, and consequently directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The bail was conditioned on compliance with the Excise Court's requirements. The order effectively granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the seized illicit liquor is not in the accused's conscious physical possession.
  • Whether the facts disclosed justify the issuance of a bail order under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482 BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • CrPC
  • excise law
  • possession

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40131 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2026 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Vikrama Sahani s/o Late Raghunath Sahani Resident of village- Banparua,
                 PS- Kesaria, Distt-East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-06-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Kesariya P.S.

                   Case No.42 of 2026 registered under Sections 274, 275 of

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 56 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of petitioner transpired on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40131 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                            2/3




          basis of disclosure made by chowkidar of the village. It is

          submitted that the recovery of illicit liquor was made from

          Chawar, which is an open place accessible by general public

          and for the same the seizure list was prepared. It is

          submitted that admittedly the recovery of illicit liquor was

          not made from conscious physical possession of the

          petitioner. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted

          that the petitioner found involved in three more criminal

          cases, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not

          appears to be made from conscious physical possession of

          this petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in

          the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within

          a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special, Excise Court
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40131 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         No- 3, Civil Court, East Champaran at Motihari, in

                         connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No.42 of 2026, subject

                         to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                         CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                           (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

aniket/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.