Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Utkarsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is allowed, subject to bail bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

Utkarsh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 320, 338, 336(3) and 336(4) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a dispute over a Rs.2 lakh misappropriation claim. He asserted a clean antecedent, denied taking the alleged cash, and argued that the matter was a personal dispute given criminal colour by the informant. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The anticipatory bail application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances alleged
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to abscond or tamper with evidence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false implication
  • misappropriation
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40589 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-723 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Utkarsh Kumar S/o Suresh Sharma Resident of Village - Bachhra(Baghra),
                 P.S. - Mohanpur, District - Samastipur.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Gaurav Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Yogendra Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-07-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest

                   in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   318(4), 320, 338, 336(3), 336(4) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

                   alleges that his wife hired petitioner as pharmacist in her medical

                   shop on 01.06.2024. Further, petitioner brought Rajiv and

                   introduced him as his guardian and signed the contract to work in

                   the shop for an year. Further, Rajiv took an advance of Rs.25,000/-

                   and petitioner took cash of Rs.1,75,000/- and thereafter petitioner

                   left the job in December, 2024, thus it is alleged that accused

                   persons misappropriated an amount of Rs.2, Lacs.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

                   informant. It is further submitted that the petitioner completely
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40589 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                                           2/2




                         denies the allegation that he took Rs.1,75,000/- in cash. It is next

                         submitted that the dispute is purely personal to which a criminal

                         colour has been given. It is also submitted that if privilege of

                         anticipatory bail application is granted, the petitioner will not

                         abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his

                         innocence.

                                      5. Learned A.P.P.          opposes      the   anticipatory   bail

                         application.

                                      6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                         counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event

                         of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

                         period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his

                         furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                         Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                         satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is

                         pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P. S.

                         Case No.723 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under

                         Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.