Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vinay Shankar Chaudhary @ Lallu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, sureties and verification of his antecedents.

Summary

The petitioner, Vinay Shankar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from another person, Angan Kumar. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made by Angan Kumar while in police custody, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail on the condition that the petitioner furnish a bail bond of Rs.500 with two sureties and that the trial court verify his criminal antecedents. If any antecedent is found, the bail will not be confirmed; if he is found to have a clean record, the bail will be confirmed. The order was made under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in the present case under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
  • Whether the confessional statement of a co‑accused made in police custody can be relied upon to deny bail.
  • Whether the absence of conscious possession and a clean antecedent justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • confessional statement
  • clean antecedent
  • bail bond
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40726 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Vinay Shankar Chaudhary @ Lallu Chaudhary Son of Dev Kumar Chaudhary
                 Resident of Village - Chilhaush, P.S.- Sandesh, District - Bhojpur
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered

                   for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of

                   recovery of 10 litres of liquor from possession of Angad Kumar.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that

                   petitioner came to be implicated based on the confessional statement

                   of Angad Kumar in police custody which does not have any

                   evidentiary value in the eye of law.

                                5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                   anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40726 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                     counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,

                     above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period

                     of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail

                     on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection

                     with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, subject to the conditions as

                     laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                  7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned

                     Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and

                     if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it would

                     be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this

                     Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the

                     provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is

                     found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent

                     in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be

                     confirmed forthwith.


                                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.