Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hareram YadavversusState Of Bihar and Anr

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was withdrawn and the court disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Hareram Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw it. The court considered the request and, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn. The court disposed of the matter as withdrawn, concluding the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • withdrawal of petition
  • High Court
  • Petition dismissed

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40838 of 2018
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani
                   ======================================================
                   Hareram Yadav S/O Late Yogendra Yadav R/o Vill.- Pariharpur, P.S.-
                   Rajnagar, District- Madhubani.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
              1.   State Of Bihar
              2.   Shitali Devi W/O Hareram Yadav, R/o Vill.- Pariharpur, P.S.- Station-
                   Rajnagar, District- Madhubani.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                         ORAL ORDER

5    04-02-2026                     Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                     present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has become

                     infructuous, accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw the

                     same.

                                  2. Permission is accorded.

                                  3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as

                     withdrawn.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
rakhi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.