Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Saroj kumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that permission may be granted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, resulting in its dismissal.

Summary

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner's counsel subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4098 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2025 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Saroj kumar S/o- Srinarayan Sah R/v- Raksa Rahimpur Ps- Dhaka Dist- East
                  Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Abhishek Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    29-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.