Patna High Court
Ravi Manjhi @ Rabi Manjhi @ Rabi Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
Since the recovery of illicit liquor was not shown to be in the petitioners' exclusive possession and procedural defects existed in the seizure, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.
Summary
Petitioners Ravi Manjhi and Anuradha Devi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 2,656.8 litres recovered from a hut, a bike and an open field. They contended that the liquor was not in their exclusive possession, that the search and seizure did not comply with Section 103(4) of the BNSS Act because no independent witness was present, and that the recovery was based solely on statements of co‑accused. The State opposed their application for anticipatory bail. The court observed that the recovery was prima facie not from the petitioners' conscious possession and that procedural lapses in the seizure existed. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS Act.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in view of the alleged illegal liquor possession.
- Whether the seizure of the liquor complied with Section 103(4) of the BNSS Act.
- Whether the recovered liquor was in the exclusive possession of the petitioners.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- BNSS Act — s. 103(4), 482(2)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illegal liquor
- possession
- search and seizure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- CrPC Section 438
- BNSS Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41189 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2026 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN District-
Darbhanga
======================================================
1. Ravi Manjhi @ Rabi Manjhi @ Rabi Kumar Manjhi, S/o Ram Sagar Manjhi,
2. Anuradha Devi, W/o Late Ranjit Manjhi,
Both are Resident of Village- Maintha, P.S -Kusheshwar Asthan, District
-Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishor Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Gulnar Begum, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR
and apprehending their arrest in connection with Kusheshwar
Asthan P.S. Case No.148 of 2026 registered under Section
30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,
2022.
3. Allegation against the petitioners are to engage
in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is
recovery of 2656.8 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41189 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
2/3
the petitioners that the alleged recovery was effected from
three distinct locations, namely, a hut of Chandrakala Devi, a
bike and an open field. The field being, an open place
accessible to the general public, cannot be said to be in the
exclusive possession or control of these petitioners. It is
further submitted that compliance of Section 103(4) of
BNSS qua search of premises has not been followed with,
inasmuch, as no independent witness was associated with
the search and seizure list and the seizure witnesses were
police personnel themselves. It is submitted that nothing has
been recovered from the conscious possession of the
petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners have
been implicated solely on the basis of the disclosure made by
co-accused namely, Arjun Rai and Chandrakala Devi who
have been apprehended on the spot. The petitioner no.1 has
clean antecedent whereas the petitioner no.2 bears two
criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41189 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
3/3
taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie
not appears to be made from physical possession of this
petitioners, accordingly, the petitioners above-named, in the
event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a
period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released
on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge-II, (Excise
Act), Darbhanga in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S.
Case No.148 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of
the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Raushan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.