Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hare Ram Sah @ Hare RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond of Rs. 15,000 and two sureties.

Summary

Hare Ram Sah was arrested in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the NDPS Act, involving contraband beyond commercial quantity. He had been in judicial custody since 18 March 2025 and the charge was framed on 8 April 2026, with no witnesses examined. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, sought regular bail after a prior bail application was rejected. The State, represented by Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, opposed the bail. Considering the length of custody, lack of prior criminal record, and the fact that the trial had not progressed, the Court inclined to grant bail, ordering the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The bail was granted, and the petitioner was released subject to the bond conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case involving contraband beyond commercial quantity under the NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the period of pre‑trial detention and absence of witness examination justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • contraband
  • judicial custody
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41462 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Hare Ram Sah @ Hare Ram S/O Late Sahdeo Sah @ Late Sahdev Sah R/O
                 Village - Mathurapura, Ward No.- 6, P.S- Ballia (Balliya )District Begusarai

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ballia

                   (Balliya) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 30(a), 32(2) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

                   read with Sections 8(a)(c) and 21 of the NDPS Act.

                           3.      This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail.

                   The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail

                   which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated

                   12.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51740 of 2025 taking into

                   consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and

                   recovery of contraband beyond commercial quantity coupled

                   with embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41462 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                         2/2




                               4.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                       petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.03.2025

                       without any rhymes or reason and has got no criminal

                       antecedent. It is further submitted that charge has already been

                       framed against the petitioner on 08.04.2026 but no any witness

                       has been examined in this case.

                               5.      Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                       the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                               6.    Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                       the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner,

                       this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                7.     Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                       bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                       below/concerned Court in connection with Ballia (Balliya) P.S.

                       Case No. 88 of 2025.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.