Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Indresh Ram @ Inderdeo RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Indresh Ram, applied for bail in a case involving serious offences including murder, dacoity, and possession of arms and explosives, alleged to be part of a Naxal attack that killed two police personnel. He is also accused in eight other similar Naxal-related cases and has been an absconder for 25 years. The court examined whether bail could be granted given the gravity of the charges, his alleged involvement in violent Naxal activities, and his long history of evading the law. Considering his affiliation with Naxalism, the seriousness of the offences, and his criminal antecedents, the judge was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed, with the court clarifying that this decision pertains only to the bail matter and does not prejudice the trial's merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner accused of multiple serious offences, including murder and possession of arms, who is alleged to be a Naxal and has been absconding for 25 years.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Naxalism
  • serious offences
  • absconding
  • high court
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • Explosive Substances Act
  • Criminal Law Amendment Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41478 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2001 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Indresh Ram @ Inderdeo Ram S/o Late Banwari Lal R/o Vill- Akbarpur, P.S.-
                 Paliganj, Distt- Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Diksha Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-06-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Masaudhi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2001 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 120(B), 302 and

                   379 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act;

                   Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Act and Section 17 of the

                   CLA Act.

                                 3. The naxals attacked the police personnel and killed

                   two persons. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in the

                   crime. He is accused in eight more cases of similar nature

                   arising out of naxal activity. He is an absconder for the last 25

                   years.

                                 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a naxal
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41478 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                                       2/2




                     and also the criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant bail

                     to the petitioner.

                                  5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  6. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.