Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
90 judgments · newest first · showing 1–90
The accused, Salman, applied for bail in a case under Sections 288 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act for allegedly possessing fire‑cracker material. He claimed false implication, lack of an independent witness to the arrest and recovery, and highlighted his cooperation …
Kuldeep Rajput applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.117 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 288 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, …
Rishabh Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a sanction order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muradabad, in a case instituted under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act and 9(k)/1(k) of the Explosive Substances Act. The applicant alleged that no offence was made out …
The petitioner, Brijnandan Rai, father of two co-accused, was arrested in connection with a bomb‑throwing incident and charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 207) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. He sought regular bail, contending his clean antecedent …
The petitioner, Ashok Kora, sought bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, Railway Act and U.A.P. Act, for which he had been in custody since March 2025. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, his name having been added to …
The petitioners, Gautam Mahto and Rohit Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged manufacturing of adulterated petrol. The prosecution alleged that they rented a godown where such petrol was produced, charging them under multiple sections of the B.N.S., the …
The petitioner, Md. Nijam, was arrested on 13 March 2026 in connection with a case involving an explosion that injured five children, alleged under IPC Section 307 and the Explosive Substances Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the testimony of a co‑accused, Manoj Sah, as the petitioner’s name …
The petitioner, Indresh Ram, applied for bail in a case involving serious offences including murder, dacoity, and possession of arms and explosives, alleged to be part of a Naxal attack that killed two police personnel. He is also accused in eight other similar Naxal-related cases and has been an …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act, alleging that he was innocent and that no direct material linked him to the offence. The prosecution alleges that the …
The petitioner, Upendra Choudhary, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑A), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, alleging that the seized weapons and grenades were recovered from a joint family house and not from his personal …
Gulab Kumar applied for regular bail in a case (PS Case No. 436 of 2023) involving alleged tampering with an Indian Oil Corporation pipeline to illegally extract petroleum, constituting offences under Sections 379, 511, 427, 285 and 120B of the IPC, as well as sections of the Explosive Substances …
The petitioner, Darogi Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged Naxalite activity, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Explosive Substances Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The prosecution’s case is based on information from an …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh Bhokta, was arrested in connection with a raid on 2-11-2018 during which extremists allegedly fired at police, resulting in the seizure of arms and ammunition but no injuries. He has been in custody since 24-07-2025 and faces charges under multiple provisions of the IPC, …
The petitioner, Aurangjeb, was named in a case (No. 691 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after a raid recovered gun‑powder and other blast material from his residence. The petitioner contended that the …
The petitioner, Dharamvir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a bomb attack on an informant's house and charged under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons hurled the bomb, and the petitioner’s name was linked …
Manoj Soren applied for regular bail in a case involving numerous serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act and the U.P. Act, alleged to be a Naxalite who assaulted police. The prosecution relied on police suspicion and alleged criminal antecedents, while the petitioner …
The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …
The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …
The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …
Petitioner Sanjeet Paswan was arrested on 26-08-2025 in connection with FIR dated 25-08-2025 alleging that he, along with others, threw bombs at an informant's terrace, violating sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Explosive Substances Act. The petitioner claimed he was …
The petitioner, Darogi Yadav, was charged under Sections 4, 5, 6 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 16 to 22 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in connection with a 2016 case. He has been in custody since December 13, 2022 and faces twenty additional serious cases. The prosecution …
The petitioners, Bipin Saw and Shubhag Saw, were charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 436 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 10 and 13 of the UAPA for allegedly using a cylinder bomb to damage a Harizan school. They have been …
Naika Hansda was arrested in connection with a 2003 terrorist attack in Khaira, Jamui, where a large group of extremists murdered three persons, looted property and used dynamite. The FIR, despite a procedural defect, named the petitioner as an identified participant, and he has been in custody …
The petitioner, Dilip Sahani, was arrested in 2018 for alleged participation in a gathering where explosives were found, leading to charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 414 and Explosive Substances Act sections 4 and 5. He has nine prior criminal cases, including a conviction for a serious …
The petitioner, Pappu Sah, was arrested in connection with a 2009 case involving alleged attempt to murder and use of explosives, and has been in custody since January 2026. The prosecution alleges that co‑accused Arun Sah and Sonu Sah threw a bomb at an informant, while the petitioner was merely …
Petitioner Karu Yadav sought regular bail for a 2015 case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Explosive Substances Act and the CLA Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid, based on a secret informant, recovered four mobile phones, four can bombs, five …
Kundan Yadav, detained since March 2021 for alleged offences under the IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act, CLA and UAPA, applied for bail after two earlier rejections. He claimed innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR, no material was recovered from him, and the trial had not progressed …
The petitioner, Anil Yadav, was arrested on 28‑12‑2024 in connection with an FIR dated 04‑10‑2020 alleging possession of explosive substances, charged under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the U.A.P. Act. He applied for bail, contending that the only …
The petitioner, Md Pappu, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 353, 307/34 of the IPC and the Explosive Substances Act, although his name was not mentioned in the FIR. The prosecution’s case relied solely on confessional statements of co‑accused Ranjeet Kumar and Md. Ashraf Alam, …
Mukesh Paswan was arrested in July 2025 for alleged involvement in a 2018 FIR that charged him with offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act and the UAPA, including alleged Maoist activities. He applied for bail, arguing that co‑accused had been released on regular bail and that he …
Azad Mian was convicted by the Sessions Court under Sections 25(1‑B) and 26 of the Arms Act for possession of eight improvised explosive devices, a country‑made pistol and live cartridges recovered from his bag. The prosecution relied on the testimony of nine police witnesses, a seizure list, …
The petitioners, Raju Sahni and Harihar Sahni, applied for bail in a session trial (No. 968/2025) arising from a 2011 incident where miscreants allegedly threatened and entered a house with weapons and explosives. The prosecution alleged offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the …
Basudeo Yadav was convicted by a Sessions Court under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly setting fire to a hut during a violent incident linked to a land dispute. The prosecution's case relied solely on four witnesses, all of whom were close relatives of the informant and thus …
The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Singh and Shobhan Choudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16 September 2017 that had taken cognizance against them under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act. The order …
The petitioner, Indal Paswan, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2022 dacoity case (PS No. 48) in Babubarhi, Madhubani. He is charged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act, and has …
The petitioner, Lallu Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged storage of large quantities of diesel and petrol at his hotel, allegedly with the collusion of an Indian Oil driver, leading to charges under sections 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 3 and 7 of …
The petitioner, Ramswaroop Bhuiya, was arrested in connection with a 2015 case involving alleged firing on police and CRPF personnel during a raid in forest areas of Gaya district. He faces a slew of charges under the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act, the U.A.P. Act and …
The petitioner, Bhuwan Kumar Ram, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged theft and sale of large quantities of diesel and petrol, which were purportedly intended for adulteration of food. He was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Explosive …
The petitioner, Bhola Bhokta, was arrested in connection with a 2017 incident where Naxalites attacked an informant and took guards hostage. The FIR named over 40 unknown persons and listed numerous serious offences under the IPC, the Explosive Substances Act and the UAPA, but made no specific …
The petitioner, Abhay Panjiyara, was arrested in connection with a 2016 case involving alleged shootings that resulted in one death and injuries to another. He faces charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307, the Arms Act (Sec. 27) and the Explosive Substances Act (Secs. 3 and 4). The …
Aditya Yadav was arrested in connection with a Naxalite‑related case involving the recovery of a 10 kg bomb and charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Explosive Substances Act, the U.P. Act and the C.L. Act. He has been in custody since 24‑02‑2023 and is also implicated in …
The petitioner, Gulab Kumar, was charged in Pandarak Police Station Case No.10 of 2023 for theft of petroleum from a pipeline, invoking sections 379, 411, 427 and 120-B of the IPC, sections 15/16 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline Act, 1962, sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act and …
Muslim Miyan was convicted under Sections 302/34, 307/34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to life imprisonment with several terms of rigorous imprisonment. After serving more than 14 years in actual custody and over 20 years …
Manoj Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Riga Police Station Case No. 50 of 2007, which involves serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The FIR does not name him; the allegations …
The appellant, Chandan Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Munger, for illegal manufacturing and possession of firearms under Sections 25(1)(a) and 26(11) of the Arms Act, based on a police raid that allegedly recovered gun‑making tools and gunpowder from his house. The …
The petitioner, Md. Nasim, was arrested in connection with a case where police alleged that unknown assailants fired bullets and threw a bomb, injuring a police officer. He was charged under IPC sections 307, 353 and 34, the Arms Act section 27 and the Explosive Substances Act sections 3 and 4. The …
The petitioner, Munna Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 314 of 2021) that alleged his involvement in a murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Explosive Substances Act. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stemmed solely …
Harihar Sahani was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act and the CLA Act for alleged Maoist‑related offences, including murder, rioting, robbery and bomb blasts. He had been in custody since 30 January 2024 and his earlier bail application was …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a 2014 case (Chakia P.S. Case No. 151) involving alleged train derailment and multiple serious offences under the IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, UAPA, Criminal Law …
Md. Nasim was arrested in connection with a robbery and dacoity case (Sections 395, 397 IPC) involving arms and explosives. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a co‑accused’s confessional statement, with no material recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner argued innocence and cited that …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing and planting a live bomb, charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Arms Act and the Explosive Substances Act. He had been in custody since 21 October 2022 and argued that his inclusion in the FIR was …
The petitioner, Md. Jahid Ali, was charged under sections 395 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act for alleged involvement in a robbery and possession of explosives. The prosecution alleged that miscreants looted cash and valuables from a house, while the …
Vishal Sah @ Vishal Paswan was arrested in connection with a 2014 case alleging that a Maoist‑led explosive attack derailed a goods train, charging him under multiple sections of the IPC, the Explosive Substances Act, the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, the Unlawful Activities …
Petitioners Biru Kumar and Rajdhari Ram were accused in a 2014 case involving a goods‑train derailment allegedly caused by Maoist‑planted explosives, and were charged under multiple serious provisions of the IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, UAPA, Criminal …
The petitioner, Umesh Prasad Jaiswal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Explosive …
Lalan Yadav was arrested on 9 June 2025 in connection with a 2013 case involving a blast that resulted in deaths. He is charged under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, CLA Act, UAPA and the PDPP Act. The prosecution’s case rests on the informant’s testimony and the …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 504, 506 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act for allegedly demolishing a house with dynamite, forcibly entering the premises, and threatening the …
The petitioner, Md. Ekhlaque, was arrested on 21‑06‑2025 in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 353, 307/34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. The prosecution’s case is based on two FIRs, neither of which originally named the …
The petitioner, Chhotelal Dubey, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act alleged a bomb explosion at his residence. He claimed he was not present at the time and that the house, usually locked, could have been accessed by a third party. The State …
Kapil Paswan was arrested in connection with a bomb blast at an Airtel mobile tower, charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 435, 436, 120(B)), the Explosive Substances Act (sections 3 and 4) and the CLA Act (section 17). The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated for political …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and two others hurled a bomb at an informant, though no injury was reported. He filed an application for regular bail, claiming false implication and citing an ongoing dispute with the informant. The …
Kamela Khatoon, a woman from Kishanganj, sought bail after the police registered a case against her under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Explosive Substances Act, alleging she had exploded a bomb to frame others. She contended that the earlier case was false, no explosive …
The Patna High Court heard bail applications of Dashrat Mahto, Suresh Mahto and Sunil Mahto, accused in a 2014 case involving murder, attempted murder, robbery and the use of explosives and firearms. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victim, hurled bombs, fired at him and stole …
The petitioners, Dashrat Mahto and his brothers Suresh and Sunil, applied for bail in a case arising from a 2014 incident in Jamui where the deceased Niraj Singh was allegedly assaulted, bombed, shot, and robbed by a group of accused including the petitioners. The prosecution, based on the …
The petitioner, Md. Dawloo, applied for bail in a criminal case involving alleged theft of petroleum from Indian Oil pipelines, charged under Sections 379, 411, 427, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, Sections 15 and 16 of the Petroleum and Minerals …
The petitioner, Md. Isteyak Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2017 case involving alleged possession of explosives, mining, and forest contraband. He argued that the motorcycle seized in the operation was his, previously reported stolen, and that he had a clean record. The State …
The petitioner, Satish Mandal, was arrested on 5 August 2025 in connection with a bomb‑explosion case (Sherghati PS Case No.568/2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 307, 427/34 and Explosive Substances Act sections 3, 4 and 5. The FIR did not name him; his alleged involvement emerged only from …
The petitioners, Gurusahai Yadav and Nuneshwr Yadav, were arrested in connection with a 2005 Naxalite encounter and charged under multiple sections of the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act and the CLA Act. They have been in custody since May 2025 and claim no prior criminal record. Their …
The petitioner, Aamir Akhtar, was arrested after a police raid on his father’s house uncovered a large quantity of illegal firecrackers allegedly stored without a licence. He was charged under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 288 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. …
The petitioner, Bindeshwar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2010 case alleging his participation in an extremist attack on a construction company’s camp, involving extortion, arson and use of explosives. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with …
The Supreme Court examined six FIRs registered in West Bengal relating to alleged explosive offences and a High Court order that transferred the investigation to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The High Court had directed the Central Government to invoke its power under Section 6(5) of the …
In May 2007 a protest turned violent at the Dinakaran newspaper office, resulting in arson and the death of three employees. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajaram, who was on bandobust duty, was charged under Sections 217 and 221 of the IPC for allegedly disobeying orders and …
The appellants were convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and IPC for the murder of a Hindu leader. The Supreme Court examined whether the required prior sanction under Section 20‑A of TADA had been validly obtained. It found that the sanctioning authority …
In 1992 a bomb attack resulted in the death of Rupchand Sk, whose statement at the scene was recorded by the investigating officer (PW15) but not entered into evidence. The prosecution later sought, under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to recall PW15 to record this statement; the …
Three criminal appeals under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) sought bail for appellants – Izharl Haq Abdul Hamid Shaikh, Amir Gulam Husein Bandukwala and labourer Jivan Raghu Varli – who had been denied bail by Designated TADA Courts. The appellants argued that …
The petitioners, accused in the 2001 Parliament attack, were originally convicted of several offences under POTA, the IPC and the Explosive Substances Act, with death sentences imposed. The Supreme Court partially set aside the convictions, substituting a conviction under IPC s.123 (concealment of …
On 3 February 1994, the informant Prakash Chandra Yadav and a pillion rider were attacked by the accused who hurled bombs at them and later pursued them with a licensed gun. Although one bomb exploded, the informant sustained no injury. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 307 …
Seventeen persons were tried for offences including murder; five were convicted, and the High Court upheld the murder convictions of A1‑A4 under Section 302 read with Section 34. The appellants argued that the charge sheet did not specifically allege an offence under Section 34 and that the evidence …
The appellant, Salim Akhtar (Mota), was convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act (TADA) for allegedly possessing a pistol, cartridges, a bomb and RDX that were recovered after he led police to a polythene bag in an open area. The pistol was not sealed at the time of …
The appellant, Nallabothu Venkaiah, was one of sixteen accused who allegedly formed an unlawful assembly, hurled bombs and used axes, knives and spears to kill R. Venkateswarlu on 13 October 1992. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC (simpliciter) and sentenced him to life …
During a minister's visit to Kannur in 1994, police firing resulted in five deaths and many injuries, leading to two FIRs (Crimes 353/94 and 354/94). After a change of government, a Commission of Inquiry blamed the firing and the Director‑General of Police ordered a fresh FIR (Crime 268/97) three …
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five appellants under Section 3(3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for alleged conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, the recovery of large quantities of arms, ammunition and explosives, and related offences under the …
The Supreme Court examined applications filed by the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code to withdraw TADA charges against accused linked to the forest brigand Veerappan, whose kidnapping of actor Rajkumar prompted the Karnataka government to concede to …
Shamsher Khan was convicted for manufacturing and storing bombs in his Delhi house, which later exploded, killing three and injuring many. He was sentenced under IPC sections 304, 308, 120‑B, TADA sec. 5 and Explosive Substances Act sec. 4(b). On appeal he challenged the culpable homicide …
The Supreme Court examined two sets of review petitions filed under Article 137 and Order XL of the Supreme Court Rules: one by four convicts sentenced to death for offences under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code, and another by the State …
The Supreme Court examined an incident where the Coast Guard vessel CGS Vivek and the Indian Navy ship INS Kirpan intercepted the merchant vessel MV Yahata on the high seas because it was not flying any national flag and was emitting "Not under Command" lights. The master, V. Jayachandra, gave a …
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the registered society "Common Cause" seeking relief for under‑trial prisoners and accused persons in pending criminal matters. The Court observed that prolonged pendency of criminal cases infringes the right to life and …
R.K. Singh was detained under section 12(2) of the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 on the ground that he was an anti‑social element habitually committing offences under Chapters XVI and XVII of the Indian Penal Code. The detention order was based on several incidents, including a raid in which he …
The Supreme Court examined two writ petitions challenging orders of preventive detention under the National Security Act, 1980 issued against Alijan Mian and Jadunandan Sah, who were already in jail and likely to be released on bail. The detaining authority justified the detention on the ground …
The appellants, four brothers who ran the shop M.F. Maniyar & Sons, were convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and related provisions for possessing and selling large quantities of potassium cyanide, potassium chlorate, detonators and other …
