Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brijnandan Rai @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Brijnandan Rai, father of two co-accused, was arrested in connection with a bomb‑throwing incident and charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 207) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. He sought regular bail, contending his clean antecedent and that the co‑accused, who were directly implicated in throwing the bomb, had already been granted bail by the lower court. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, noting the petitioner’s age, clean record, and the bail already granted to the co‑accused, allowed the bail application, directing release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to charge framing. The Court clarified that its order is limited to bail and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being named in the FIR for offences involving bomb‑throwing.
  • Whether the clean antecedent and the bail granted to co‑accused affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Explosive Substances Act
  • clean antecedent
  • co‑accused
  • Patna High Court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45669 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2021 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Brijnandan Rai @ Rocky S/o Babulal Rai R/o Village - Naya Gao, P.S -
                 Pirbahore, District - Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 141 of 2021 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 207

                   of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Explosive

                   Substance Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

                   others are said to have thrown bomb during a fight.

                                 4. From the FIR, it appears that the co-accused

                   Raushan @ Sadhu @ Shankar, who is the son of the petitioner

                   and Bikka have thrown bomb. The petitioner has been named in

                   the FIR. Learned counsel submits that the present petitioner is

                   the father of the co-accused aushan @ Sadhu @ Shankar and he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45669 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                            2/3




          is 60 years old having clean antecedent. He further submits that

          the aforesaid two co-accused persons, who are alleged to have

          thrown bomb have been granted bail by the Court below itself.

          The petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026 having clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the father

          of co-accused against whom the specific allegation of throwing

          bomb was made and who has already been granted bail by the

          Court below together with the fact that he has clean antecedent,

          this application is allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail, after framing of charge if charge has not

          already been framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

          (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, 16,

          Patna/ concerned Court below in connection with Pirbahore P.S.

          Case No. 141 of 2021.

                       8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

          herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

          application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45669 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P .Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.