Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to both petitioners, subject to bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Amit Kumar, were named in an FIR for theft of a motorcycle under Section 379 of the IPC (Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014). They were apprehended as pillion riders with co‑accused Tinku Choudhary, but the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the co‑accused, not from the petitioners. The petitioners, who had previously been acquitted by the trial court and claim clean antecedents, applied for bail, while the State opposed the relief. The court examined the fact that the vehicle was not found in the petitioners’ possession and considered their prior acquittal and good character. Relying on Section 482(2) of the BNSS, the court directed that both petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. The order was made subject to the conditions prescribed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused under Section 379 IPC when the stolen property was not recovered from them
  • Whether the petitioners’ prior acquittal and clean antecedents warrant bail despite the State’s opposition

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • theft
  • Section 379 IPC
  • Section 482
  • clean antecedents
  • co‑accused
  • recovery of stolen property
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42180 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2014 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District-
                                                        Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pankaj Kumar Son of Naresh Ray Resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 08,
                  Mohanpur, P.S.- Samastipur Muffasil, District- Samastipur (Bihar)
           2.    Amit Kumar Son of Ashok Ray Resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 08,
                 Mohanpur, P.S.- Samastipur Muffasil, District- Samastipur (Bihar)

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-07-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2.The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Samastipur

                   Muffasil P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC.

                                3. As per FIR the motorcycle of informant was

                   stolen by unknown miscreants.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing

                   on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner was

                   apprehended in Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 182 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42180 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                            2/3




          2014, where he was the pillion rider alongwith Tinku

          Choudhary who was driving the motorcycle and was

          apprehended by the police. It is submitted that said

          motorcycle upon investigation found stolen motorcycle of

          the informant of the present case. It is submitted that

          on the basis of self confessions/ confessional statement

          of co-accused as made in Samastipur Town P.S. Case

          No. 182 of 2014, the petitioner was implicated with

          present crime in question, where he has already

          acquitted by ld. Trial court. It is argued that motorcycle

          of informant was not recovered from the possession of

          this petitioner rather from the co-accused Tinku

          Choudhary. Petitioners claimed clean antecedents.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and

          by taking note of fact as recovery of motorcycle of the

          informant not appears to be made from the physical

          possession of these petitioners, accordingly both above-

          named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42180 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        surrender before the court below within a period of four

                        weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing

                        bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of the learned CJM, Samastipur /concerned

                        Court, where the case is pending in connection with

                        Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014, subject

                        to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                        BNSS.



                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.