Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Sale and Settlement (BNSS)

41 judgments · newest first · showing 1–41

Kamlesh Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.410 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He has four prior cases under the Excise Act and claims he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of his …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.480 litres of liquor from a public market. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Amit Kumar, were named in an FIR for theft of a motorcycle under Section 379 of the IPC (Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014). They were apprehended as pillion riders with co‑accused Tinku Choudhary, but the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the …

Bobby Kumar @ Babi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bobby Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 12 litres of liquor were recovered from another person, Ravi Shankar Kumar. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no direct involvement, and …

Rinku Devi @ Rinki Devi @ Rinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rinku Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and that the 2018 amendment to the …

Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of Yadavs from Avrakkha village, feared arrest in connection with Suiya Police Station Case No. 69 of 2025, which alleged they had burnt an informant’s shop. The prosecution charged them under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) for offences including arson, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar, owner of a vehicle allegedly used by his brother to transport 540 ml of illicit liquor, faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent and offering to donate Rs.10,000 to charity without admitting …

Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tuntun Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he was involved in the recovery of 14.145 litres of liquor from a thatched hut that does not belong to him. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended …

Rauki Kumar @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rauki Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant and alleged involvement in a robbery where a golden chain was snatched, with co‑accused also accused of firing at the informant. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the charge of firing did not pertain to him and …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was implicated in a case (Deoria P.S. Case No. 81 of 2026) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 68 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a thatched room behind his house. He applied for anticipatory bail, …

Navin Ray @ Navin Kumar @ Naveen KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Navin Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 29.83 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, that the 2018 amendment abolished the concept of …

Sachin Sahani @ Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sachin Sahani and Ankit Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they were not in conscious possession, were not owners of the vehicle, and that the case against them …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pappu Kumar and Amit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 146.885 litres of liquor from a house that does not belong to them. They argued they had no conscious possession, the …

Lav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lav Kumar, the petitioner, faced arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 7.44 litres of liquor in a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure and that the vehicle was misused by another person, …

Meena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Meena Devi applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She was not arrested and no liquor was found in her possession. The petitioner claimed she has a clean …

Sanjeet Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle owner, and the case was based solely on a …

Ramesh Mahto @ Bachkun MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.350 litres of liquor found in a washroom of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the property is jointly owned, and …

Rajesh Paswan @ Raghwendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rajesh Paswan and Dilip Kumar (also known as Govind Kumar Singh) feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 7.44 litres of liquor from the Balaji Marriage Complex. They contended that no liquor was found in their possession, …

Raju BhaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Bhai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 74.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that a person named Chhotu …

Raj Kishor RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kishor Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor from a public area near the Bagmati river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to …

Hemant @ Hemant Kumar Yadav @ Guddu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hemant Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 273, 274 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 227.530 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 350.250 litres of liquor behind the house of Ram Balak Yadav. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, he was …

Rakesh Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 477/2024) alleging his involvement in the recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a public area near a cremation ground, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he …

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kajal Kumari was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from two motorcycles she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No 403/2024) on the basis that his motorcycle was used by co‑accused Rakesh Kumar during the alleged offence. The co‑accused was apprehended by villagers who also produced a country‑made pistol and live cartridges, indicating a …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 55.210 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not seized from his personal possession, the house being a joint …

Sitaram Ram @ Sita Ram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sitaram Ram Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, and the …

Rajendra Jaiswal @ Rajendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rajendra Jaiswal and Guddu Jaiswal were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 175.09 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Dhananjay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public open field and not from his possession. He highlighted his prior three criminal cases, two of which were also …

Raunak Mandal @ Raunak Kr. Mandal @ Ronit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raunak Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint (Case No. 38 of 2023) alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery, and sexual offences. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner purchased the complainant for Rs. …

Ritik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritik Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The FIR alleged that objectionable material was recovered during a raid, but no incriminating material was found on …

Manoj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manoj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9.75 litres of liquor from sacks, which he claims were not in his possession and were located on property not belonging to him. He contended that the police had mechanically …

Sonu Ray @ Sonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 879.525 litres of liquor from a room in front of a government boring. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Surendra Kumar @ Kariya @ Surendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Chakiyaz Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicle, …

Fulwa Devi @ BagdiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fulwa Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua jaggery solution from her residence, a joint family property. She contended that she did not have conscious …

Sanjeet Ray @ Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 48 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the 2018 …

Mukesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he is alleged to be linked to the recovery of 1,575 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the …

Md. Abu NasarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Abu Nasar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 118.320 litres of liquor from his Swift Dzire vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Santoke Bhuiya @ Santokhi BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santoke Bhuiya sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of the …