Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Sharma, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 76.23 litres of foreign liquor from his vehicle, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He filed a bail petition claiming innocence, lack of any independent witnesses to the seizure, and a clean antecedent, having been in judicial custody since 19 May 2026. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the absence of independent witnesses and the petitioner’s clean record. Considering these factors, the court was inclined to grant regular bail. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being named in the FIR for offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the lack of independent witnesses to the seizure and the petitioner’s clean antecedent justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • foreign liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 47
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42572 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Sharma, Male, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Mahanati Lal
                 Sharma, Resident of Village- Bharti Nagar, Ward no 26/35, PS- Sadar,
                 District- Saharsha.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Ms. Ankita Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
              ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise

                   Sadar P.S. Case No. 309 of 2026 instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, on search, total 76.230

                   liters of foreign liquor has been recovered from the white colour

                   Maruti Suzuki Swift Desire Car.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

                   falsely been implicated in this case. She submits that petitioner

                   has no concern with the seized illicit liquor. She further submits

                   that there is no any independent witnesses of the seizure list and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42572 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          none of the independent witnesses have signed in the seizure

          list. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the

          bail petition and he is in judicial custody since 19.05.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. From perusal of the FIR, seizure list and the

          impugned order of the learned Exclusive Special Judge (Excise-

          01), Purnia dated 29.05.2026, it appears that petitioner is named

          in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it also appears that on

          the basis of written report of the informant namely, Surendra

          Paswan, Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Purnia, FIR has been

          registered under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition

          and Excise Act, 2016 against the present petitioner and the

          allegation is of recovery of foreign liquor from the possession of

          the petitioner. From perusal of seizure list, it also appears that

          there is no any independent witness of the seizure, petitioner is

          under custody since 19.05.2026 having got clean antecedent as

          stated in para 3 of the petition, so considering all these aspects

          of the case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner,

          I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the

          petitioner is allowed.          Let     the petitioner above named be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42572 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-I,

                      Purnia in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 309 of

                      2026.


                                                                (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr.

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.