Patna High Court
Nisha DeviversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court provisionally granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bail bond, sureties, and verification of her criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Nisha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 29.14 litres of liquor from a sack not in her possession. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and the alleged contraband was recovered from a location not belonging to her, with the informant’s identity omitted from the FIR. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offence. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs.500 with two sureties, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent by the trial court. If any antecedent is found, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, it will be confirmed forthwith.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case involving alleged possession of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022?
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the circumstances of recovery justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (B.N.S.S.) — s. 482(2)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022
- clean antecedent
- bail bond
- Cr.P.C. Section 438
- B.N.S.S. Section 482(2)
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42662 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2026 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna
======================================================
Nisha Devi W/O Rohit Mallik Resident of Village - New Ambedkar
Nagar,Yarpur, P.S- Gardanibagh, Dist - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and
allegation is of recovery of 29.14 litres of liquor from a sack.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was
recovered from her conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
and she came to be implicated at the instance of the local person
but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the
petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42662 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
2/3
on the case of the prosecution, when petitioner has not been
implicated based on the secret information and is a person with
clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner,
above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a
period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees
Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/Successor Court in connection with Gardanibag P.S.
Case No. 281 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned
Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner
and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case,
it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed her
antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail
application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42662 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
3/3
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the
provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.