Patna High Court
Mithun Yadav @ Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application.
Summary
The petitioner, Mithun Yadav, filed a regular bail application which was taken up on 09‑07‑2025. The coordinating bench gave him three weeks to rectify defects, but the defects remained uncorrected, leading the State to argue that the petitioner had lost interest. The petitioner’s counsel then sought permission to withdraw the bail application and be allowed to file a fresh one. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition, noting the liberty to re‑file. The order was pronounced by Justice Satyavrat Verma on 01‑05‑2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the regular bail application and be permitted to file a fresh application
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- petition
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42790 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
======================================================
Mithun Yadav @ Prince Kumar S/o Late Gopal Yadav Resident Of Village-
Badi Mirzapur, PS.- Kasim Bazar, Distt. Munger. Presently residing at
Village- Badi Jankipur, PS.- Amarpur, Distt. Banka
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 01-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The learned A.P.P. at the outset submits that the
case was taken up on 09.07.2025, when three weeks time was
granted to the petitioner to remove the defects as pointed out by
the office, by a learned Coordinate Bench, but then it appears
that the defects till date has not been removed, as such, it is
submitted that it appears that petitioner has lost interest in the
case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner rushes to the
Court at this stage and submits that he may be permitted to
withdraw the regular bail application with liberty to file afresh.
4. Permission is accorded.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42790 of 2025(3) dt.01-05-2026
2/2
5. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…