Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arun Kumar MauryaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners subject to bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Arun Kumar Maurya and Jitendra Kumar, were arrested as drivers of two vehicles from which 302.4 litres of illicit foreign liquor were seized, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 32(i),(iii), 41(i),(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were merely drivers, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no incriminating article was found in their possession, also asserting they were not the owners of the vehicles. The petitioners had been in custody since 4 December 2025, with one having a prior criminal antecedent, and argued that the requirements of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, were not complied with. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. The Court, considering the lack of direct evidence against the drivers, the duration of custody, and the statutory provisions, granted bail to both petitioners on a bond of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety and regular appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the drivers, who were not owners and had no knowledge of the illicit liquor, are entitled to bail under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act offences.
  • Whether the non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the prior criminal antecedent of one petitioner affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • driver liability
  • knowledge
  • ownership
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 103
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4280 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-729 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
           1.     Arun Kumar Maurya S/o- Ramchandra Maurya R/v- Chandapur Lohata Ps-
                  Lohata Dist- Varanasi, U.P
           2.    Jitendra Kumar S/o- Radheshyam R/v- Hariharpur Modaw Ps- Rohaniya
                 Dist- Varanasi, U.P

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Ram Bilash Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioners seeks bail in connection with Bhabua

                   Excise P.S. Case No. 729 of 2025 instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i),(iii), 41(i),(ii) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 302.4

                   litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the two cars.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

                   the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4280 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                            2/3




          that petitioners are not the owner of the vehicle. It is further

          submitted that petitioners are the driver of the alleged vehicles

          in question but he had no knowledge regarding the goods loaded

          in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 04.12.2025

          and the petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent whereas the

          petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent. There is no

          compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha

          Sanhita, 2023.

                     5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                     6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

          the case as also the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                       7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Bhabua Excise P.S.

          Case No. 729 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioners.

                       (II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every

          date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4280 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel

                       the bail bonds of the petitioners.



                                             (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
atul/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.