Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu Nut @ Gudu NutversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that mere recovery of illicit liquor from an open public area does not establish possession, thereby justifying the grant of anticipatory bail.

Summary

Guddu Nut was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 12 litres of liquor seized. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from a public cradle (palani), an open area accessible to all, and that there was no proof of his conscious possession, nor independent witnesses to the seizure. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed anticipatory bail. The court observed that the recovery did not prima facie establish possession by the petitioner and, noting his clean antecedent, directed that he be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Sections 438(2) CrPC and 482(2) BNSS. The order was pronounced by Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seizure of illicit liquor from a public place constitutes possession of the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether anticipatory bail is warranted in the absence of a prima facie case of possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • possession
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • clean antecedent
  • seizure
  • public place

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 42955 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2026 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Guddu Nut @ Gudu Nut, S/o Gautam Nut, R/o Village - Tajpur Tola Tar, P.S -
                 Janta Bazar, District - Saran at Chapra

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Janta Bazar P.S.

                   Case No.132 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 12 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered from

                   the palani (cradle), which is an open place, accessible to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 42955 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          general public and, therefore, it cannot be said that the

          alleged recovery was made from the conscious possession of

          the petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list also

          appears doubtful being not supported by independent

          witnesses rather than by police personnel. It is also pointed

          out that the name of the petitioner surfaced solely on the

          disclosure made by the Mahal Chaukidar. The petitioner

          claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, who is a

          man of clean antecedent, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-III, Saran at
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 42955 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                         3/3




                       Chhapra in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No.132 of

                       2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                       438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                         (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.