Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
13 judgments · newest first · showing 1–13
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 18.75 litres of liquor recovered. The recovery was made from a hut and not from the petitioner's physical …
Guddu Nut was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 12 litres of liquor seized. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from a public cradle (palani), an open area accessible to all, and …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 12 litres of illicit liquor. He contended that he was not present at the seizure site and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber‑fraud case where the police, acting on a tip from the Pratibimb App, raided his residence and seized mobile devices, SIM cards and a motorcycle. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner was part of an organized gang that used …
The petitioners, Awadhesh Chauhan and Guddu Sah, sought pre‑arrest bail fearing arrest in a case (Kateya PS Case No. 710 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 162 litres of illicit liquor. The FIR alleged recovery of the liquor from five …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor from premises not owned by him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that he was implicated solely on secret information. The …
The petitioner, Ashok Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Tetrahat P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 40 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a Toto vehicle. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Santosh Nut, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where five litres of illicit liquor were allegedly recovered from an open bush. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found in a public area …
The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 80 litres of liquor recovered in a 2021 case. He was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 120‑B, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving alleged recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was …
The petitioner, Nandi Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from two premises, one being a joint family house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Alok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 106 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's …
The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from a pit and two scooters. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …
