Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shristhi Kumari @ Shristi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing her to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Shristhi Kumari was arrested in connection with the murder of Sushil Chaurasia under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is that the deceased was shot by unknown persons, while the petitioner claims she is innocent and was implicated only through a confessional statement of co‑accused Suhail Khan, who alleged she hired a shooter to kill another person, Prem Pasi. No weapon or incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner, and she has no prior criminal record. The petitioner had been in judicial custody since 2 February 2026. After hearing both sides, the Court found the evidence insufficient to deny bail and ordered that she be released on a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the offences charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • confessional statement
  • co‑accused
  • Arms Act
  • judicial custody
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42961 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur
                                                        (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Shristhi Kumari @ Shristi Kumari D/O Late Shidheswar Prasad Singh R/V-
                 Bhagwanpur, Ward no.- 10, P.S- Bhagwanpur,Dist.- Kaimur at Bhabua



                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar



                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Diksha Singh, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one

                   Sushil Chaurasia was shot dead by unknown persons.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He submits that during the course of the investigation, the

                   name of this petitioner has surfaced on the basis of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42961 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          confessional statement of co-accused Suhail Khan. He also

          submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of

          the petitioner. During the course of the investigation, it has

          come out that the petitioner had hired someone to kill Prem

          Pasi, with whom she was having a relationship. It further

          transpires from the case diary that the shooter mistakenly killed

          the son of the informant. He also submits that even in a

          confessional statement it has come out that the petitioner has

          hired a shooter to kill Prem Pasi, not the deceased. Save and

          accept the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is

          nothing against the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is a lady

          having no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial

          custody since 02.02.2026.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

          Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur in connection with Bhagwanpur
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42961 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.