Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu Sharma @ Guddu ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was refused as the allegations were of a serious nature involving multiple offences.

Summary

Guddu Sharma, identified as the operator of an illegal orchestra that was raided in a joint operation by the National Commission for Human Rights, Mission Mukti Foundation and the Child Helpline, was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act. The operation rescued minor girls who were allegedly being mentally and physically exploited. Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent and that the charges were politically motivated. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the gravity of the alleged crimes. The Court, after hearing both sides, refused the anticipatory bail, holding that the seriousness of the accusations warranted the continuation of the criminal proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature and seriousness of the offences alleged under multiple statutes
  • Whether the alleged political motive can defeat the requirement of bail in a case involving human trafficking and bonded labour

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • human trafficking
  • juvenile justice
  • immoral traffic
  • bonded labour
  • criminal procedure
  • political motive

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43134 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2026 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Guddu Sharma @ Guddu Thakur Son of Sunardev Sharma @ Sondardev
                 Thakur Resident of village - Adiya, Ps- Kotwa, Dist- East Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Kotwa P. S. Case

                   No. 99 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 143(3), 146, 98 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   Sections 75, 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

                   Children) Act, Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Immoral Traffic

                   (Prevention) Act and Sections 16, 17, 18 of the Bonded Labour

                   System (Abolition) Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on the instruction of

                   National Commission for Human Rights, New Delhi, a joint

                   operation was conducted in co-ordination with Mission Mukti

                   Foundation, Delhi and an investigation team from the Child

                   Helpline, Motihari during which an illegal orchestra group was

                   raided from where minor girls, being subjected to forced mental
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43134 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                          2/2




                        and physical exploitation were rescued. Petitioner is identified

                        as an Operator of the aforesaid orchestra.

                                     4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                        petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner

                        has been made accused in this case with an ulterior motive due

                        to local politics. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                        the bail application.

                                     6. Considering the nature and seriousness of

                        accusation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is

                        refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.