Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rambachan Paswan @ Bacchan Paswan @ Bachan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that regular bail may be granted as the petitioner has not been found to possess any incriminating material and the circumstances do not justify continued detention.

Summary

Rambachan Paswan was arrested in connection with a murder case (Magadh University P.S. Case No. 142 of 2024) under Sections 103, 3/5, 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that shot and killed Shashikant Kumar Gupta. The petitioner pleaded innocence, asserting that no incriminating article was found on his person. He also highlighted that a co‑accused, Bijali Paswan, had been granted regular bail by a coordinate bench in a similar case. The State opposed the bail application. The court, after considering the facts and the precedent, ordered the petitioner’s release on regular bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to cooperation with the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to an accused charged with murder and an arms offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act.
  • Whether the bail granted to a co‑accused in a similar case is a relevant precedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • murder
  • arms act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • precedent
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43189 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2024 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Rambachan Paswan @ Bacchan Paswan @ Bachan Paswan S/O Late Shiv
                 Brat Paswan R/O Village- Badki Babhani, P.S- Bodhgaya, District- Gaya.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv.
                 For the State           :       Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   20-01-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well

                   as learned APP for the State.

                                    2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail

                   in connection with Magadh University P.S. Case No. 142 of

                   2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103, 3/5, 61 of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                    3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the

                   informant stated that on 01.07.2024 at about 7:30 PM, his son

                   Shashikant Kumar Gupta @ Chhotu Gupta was riding his

                   motorcycle to drop Pintu Prasad to his house. Near Kajichak

                   Mor, three unknown miscreants on a motorcycle overtook them,

                   stopped the motorcycle, and began assaulting Pintu Prasad.

                   Shashikant Kumar Gupta and Pintu Prasad tried to flee away,

                   but one of the accused persons fired shot at Shashikant Kumar
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43189 of 2025(5) dt.20-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     Gupta, causing his death at the spot.

                                    4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has

                     submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

                     implicated. No incriminating article was recovered from his

                     conscious possession. He has further submitted that on exactly

                     similar footing, co-accused Bijali Paswan has been granted

                     regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

                     15.05.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 15616 of 2025.

                                   5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

                     has opposed the prayer for bail.

                                    6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on

                     bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Magadh

                     University P.S. Case No. 142 of 2024, subject to the condition

                     that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and

                     make himself available as and when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

kundan/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.