Jikru @ ZikrulversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43257 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2026 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Jikru @ Zikrul son of Rizabul @ Rajabul Resident Of Village- Thapkol, Ward
                 No 12, Police Station- Jokihat, District- Araria

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-07-2026                  1.     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P., Mr. Rabindra Kumar for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 313,

                   317(4), 317(5), 334(1), 303(2) and 62 of the BNS.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

                   alleges that on 06.03.2026 at 2:00 AM, four accused were

                   apprehended who disclosed their names and also that they are

                   involved in cutting of ATM for committing theft and that they

                   had rented a house at Jokihat through Md. Sahid and use the

                   same as base and also indulged in stealing stray cattle and sell to

                   Md. Sahid and petitioner, further ATM cutting machine and

                   Bolero Pick up were seized.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43257 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

          informant, it is next submitted that from perusal of the

          allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the

          apprehended accused did not disclose about participation of the

          petitioner in cutting of ATM for committing theft, but alleges

          that they also steal stray cattle and sell the same to Md. Sahid

          and petitioner but then no stray cattle were recovered. It is also

          submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the

          petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the

          investigation to prove his innocence.

                       5. Learned       A.P.P.    for     the   State   opposes   the

          anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks

          from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

          court where the case is pending/successor court in connection

          with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026 subject to the conditions

          as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS. One of the bailors
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43257 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026
                                                           3/3




                         of the petitioner shall be his father Rizabul @ Rajabul.

                                  7.     However, it is made clear that in the event, if the

                         Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the

                         learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner,

                         despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the

                         investigation, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at

                         liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

                                  8.     Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned

                         police station through the learned Trial Court.

                                       9. Accordingly, the application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
rajesh/-

U          T