Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, with 20 litres of liquor recovered from the house of a co‑accused. The petitioner contended that the liquor was seized from the co‑accused’s premises, that he had no physical possession of the liquor, and that the seizure violated Section 103(4) of the BNSS because no independent witness was present. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted the lack of direct possession and procedural lapses, and consequently directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender, subject to a bail bond and sureties, under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the alleged illegal liquor offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
  • Whether the seizure of liquor complied with the procedural requirements of Section 103(4) of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 30
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • CrPC
  • BNSS

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43408 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2026 Thana- MANER District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Chaudhary S/o Late Bhola Chaudhary
                 Resident of village - Basti Road, Sarai, P.S.- Maner, District - Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Maner P.S. Case

                   No.360 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 20 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                   made from the house of co-accused, namely, Banty. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43408 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          also submitted that name of this petitioner arrayed solely on

          the disclosure made by the local villager. It is further argued

          that petitioner is in no way connected with the said liquor

          and also the place from where the alleged liquor was seized.

          It is also submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not

          made from conscious possession of this petitioner. It is

          further argued that the requirement of Section 103(4) of the

          BNSS has not been complied with, inasmuch as no

          independent witness was associated with the search and

          seizure list and the seizure witnesses were police personnel

          themselves. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly,

          the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43408 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                      learned Court of Special Excise Judge, Danapur, in

                      connection with Maner P.S. Case No.360 of 2026, subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                         (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.