Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

An anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the court's permission, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.

Summary

Anil Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal case (PS Case No. 425 of 2024). During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed difficulty in continuing the proceedings and sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application. After hearing the counsel, the court granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner with the court's permission

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43469 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE
                                                      District- Nawada
                  ======================================================
                  Anil Kumar S/O Birendra Prasad R/O Village- Chhatarwar, P.O- Konanadpur,
                  P.S- Pakribarawan, District- Nawada, Bihar.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Saraswati Devi W/O Rohit Manjhi R/O Vilage- Chhatarwar, Post-
                  Konanadpur, P.S- Pakribarawan, Distt.- Nawada, Bihar.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Kalyani Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    05-02-2026                 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing

                    vehemently for some times realizing his difficulty, seeks

                    permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

                               3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                      (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.