Patna High Court
Isteyaque KhanversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The Court held that the criminal miscellaneous application is disposed of as the case has become infructuous.
Summary
Isteyaque Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 01‑06‑2018 of the SDJM Motihari, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the criminal proceedings had become infructuous and therefore should be dismissed. The State of Bihar raised no objection to the petitioner's prayer. The Court examined the submissions of both counsel and considered whether the case was indeed infructuous warranting disposal. Finding that the proceedings were no longer viable, the Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application on the ground of infructuity. Consequently, no further order to quash the original criminal proceedings was required.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. on the ground that the case has become infructuous
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 498A, 504
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- Section 482
- infructuous
- quash order
- IPC Section 498A
- IPC Section 323
- IPC Section 504
- IPC Section 34
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44002 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2017 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Isteyaque Khan Son of Md. Sahid Khan, resident of Village- Paithan Patti,
P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar.
2. Anjum Ara, Wife of Isteyaque Khan, D/o Md. Izhar Khan, at present
residing at Village- Maduni Tola, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
5 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated
01.06.2018 passed by learned S.D.J.M. Motihari in connection
with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.62 of 2017, Trial No.1902 of 2018
by which cognizance under Section 498(A), 323, 504/34 of the
I.P.C. has been taken against the petitioner vide order dated
22.12.2017.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44002 of 2018(5) dt.10-02-2026
2/2
prayer of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsels
for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed
of as it has become infructuous.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…