Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sapan PanditversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sapan Pandit, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle from which 764.625 litres of foreign liquor was seized, alleged to be in violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the illicit liquor, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that he has a clean criminal record. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court noted the petitioner’s clean antecedent, lack of direct evidence, and the fact that he had been in custody since 4 December 2025, and observed non‑compliance with Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, the Court granted bail on a bond of Rs 15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding family surety, regular appearance, and possible cancellation on default.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of direct incriminating material and clean antecedent justify bail.
  • Whether Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023, has been complied with in the bail application.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • foreign liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • clean antecedent
  • driver
  • seizure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4444 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Sapan Pandit Son of Bholanath Pandit Resident of village - Khijuria, P.S.-
                 Fatehpur, District - Jamtara (Jharkhand).

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-01-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Banka

                   Excise PS Case No. 495 of 2025 instituted for the offences

                   under Section/s 30(a) & 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                           3.       The prosecution case, in short, is that 764.625 liters

                   foreign liquor was recovered from pickup vehicle.

                           4.       Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                   no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4444 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                            2/3




          that name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case as being

          driver of the vehicle in question and he was oblivious of the fact

          that illicit liquor was laden in the vehicle. The petitioner is in

          custody since 04.12.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent/s.

          There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

                  5.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  6.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of

          custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to

          grant bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court

          in connection with Banka Excise PS Case No. 495 of 2025,

          subject to the following conditions:

                  (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

          family of the petitioner.

                  (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

          consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4444 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     bail bonds of the petitioner.


                                                                  (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Raj Kishore/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.