Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deep Narayan Singh @ Deepu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to verification of his antecedents and compliance with bail conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Deep Narayan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 8,636.76 litres of liquor from three vehicles under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated by a hostile chowkidar, while his earlier case had been quashed, leaving him with a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a modest bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC, directing verification of his criminal antecedents and filing of an affidavit regarding the quashed prior case. If any antecedent is found, the bail may be revoked; otherwise, it will be confirmed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the pending liquor seizure case
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of possession and prior quashed case justify granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • liquor seizure
  • Bihar Prohibition Act
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 30
  • Section 274
  • Section 275
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45493 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2026 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Deep Narayan Singh @ Deepu Singh S/o Late Noonu Lal Singh @ Nunnu
                 Singh R/o Village - Majlipur Mathura, Mathura Majlispur, P.S. - Bidupur,
                 District - Vaishali.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ravish Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-07-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and

                   Sections 274, 275 of the BNS, 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of one case but then the case has been

                   quashed as such petitioner as of date is a person with clean

                   antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 8636.76 litres of

                   liquor from three different vehicles. It is next submitted that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45493 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                            2/3




          any of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the

          instance of chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is

          also submitted that if chowkidar was aware of the involvement

          of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform

          the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which casts an

          aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

                       4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks

          from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in

          connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.252 of 2026, subject to

          the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

          B.N.S.S.

                       6. It is made clear that the petitioner at the time of

          surrender shall also file an affidavit bringing on record the order

          by which Bidupur P.S. Case No.158 of 2020 under sections 323,

          341, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45493 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                                         3/3




                       27 of the Arms Act was quashed.

                                    7. learned trial court thereafter shall verify the

                       criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is

                       found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that

                       event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his

                       antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional

                       anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on

                       verification it is found that petitioner is a person with clean

                       antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order

                       shall be confirmed forthwith.



                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.