Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SATYENDRA YADAV @ SATYENDRA SINGH @ SATENDRA SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was a stranger to the dispute, was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record and has been in custody since 23 March 2026. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. The court observed that the firing was attributed to five persons and it was not clear whose bullet struck the victim, and, considering the petitioner’s age (64) and clean record, it was inclined to grant bail. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the charges of sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act.
  • Whether the lack of identification of the specific shooter justifies granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • shooting incident
  • identification of shooter
  • age
  • no antecedents

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45568 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 SATYENDRA YADAV @ SATYENDRA SINGH @ SATENDRA SINGH
                 Son of Late Ramchandra Singh @ Late Ramchandra Yadav Resident of
                 village - Lakshmanpur, Police Station - Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Shaheen Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026, registered for the

                   offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 109(1) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The allegation is that the informant was proceeding

                   to answer a call of nature when firing broke out between two

                   groups. He was a stranger to the dispute but sustained a gunshot

                   injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

                   present case. The petitioner has been in custody since

                   23.03.2026 and has no criminal antecedents.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45568 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. The allegation of firing is against five persons and

                     it has not been specified whose shot hit the victim. The

                     petitioner is 64 years of age, has no criminal antecedents, and

                     has been in custody since 23.03.2026. Thus, this Court is

                     inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail upon

                     furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                     with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of

                     the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, District-

                     Patna, or the concerned Court, in connection with Athmalgola

                     P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026.

                                  8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                     prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                     adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                     shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                     and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                     manner.



                                                      (Ansul, J)
abhishekkr/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.