Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, was arrested for alleged possession of a stolen motorcycle and charged under Sections 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that he was found with a motorcycle lacking a number plate and that he confessed to its being stolen. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was merely delivering dairy products for his employer, Krishna Mahto, who later confessed that the motorcycle was purchased lawfully and was himself granted bail. The petitioner had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 10 November 2025. After hearing both sides, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Sections 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • Whether the facts and circumstances justify the grant of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • motorcycle theft
  • criminal procedure
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 317
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4557 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-661 Year-2025 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Shivam Kumar, S/o Late Laxman Paswan, R/o Village- Krishna Nagar
                 Abhanda, P.S- Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga.
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 661 of 2025 dated 09.11.2025,

                   instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(5)

                   of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged

                   date of occurrence, the police personnel during vehicle checking

                   apprehended the petitioner with a Glamorous Motorcycle without

                   its number plate. The petitioner failed to produce any document of

                   the said motorcycle. It is further alleged that the petitioner

                   confessed that the said motorcycle is stolen motorcycle.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4557 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

                     petitioner was working in the Sudha Milk Shop of one Krishna

                     Mahto, who on the alleged date of occurrence, had given the said

                     motorcycle to the petitioner to supply dairy products. On the basis

                     of statement of the petitioner, Krishna Mahto was arrested, who

                     confessed that the said motorcycle was purchased for a

                     consideration amount of Rs. 5,000/-. The said Krishna Mahto has

                     been granted bail by the lower court itself. Lastly, it has been

                     submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2025 having

                     no criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the

                     case.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the

                     petitioner.

                                   6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

                     case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the

                     petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                     10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                     to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                     Darbhanga in Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 661 of 2025.


                                                                  (Khatim Reza, J)

premchand/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.