Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhonu Singh @ Navnit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied because the specific allegation of firing was made against the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhonu Singh, was arrested in connection with a case of alleged extortion and firing that injured victim Vikash Mandal. He is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences relating to extortion, attempt to murder, and unlawful discharge of firearms, as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for bail, having been in custody since 28 April 2026. The court examined the seriousness of the specific allegation of firing attributed to the petitioner and found it sufficient to deny bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed, with the court noting that its observations are limited to this application and do not prejudice the trial’s merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite serious charges of extortion and firing under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • extortion
  • firing
  • Arms Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45627 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2026 Thana- MAHESHKHUNT District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Bhonu Singh @ Navnit Kumar S/o Ranjit Singh @ Ranjeet Singh R/V -
                 Govindpur, P.S. - Maheshkhunt, Dist. - Khagaria.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Nidhi Suman, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 16 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 119(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2),

                   115(2), 109, 308(4), 329(3), 352, 351 and 351(3) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. The allegation against the petitioner is of

                   demanding extortion and firing which hit the victim Vikash

                   Mandal.

                                 4. The petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2026.

                                 5. Considering the fact that the specific allegation of

                   firing is against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to

                   the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45627 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.