Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sanjeev Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail application were examined as the petition was voluntarily withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4689 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- Sri Nagar District- Purnia
                  ======================================================
                  Sanjeev Kumar S/o Indradeo Singh R/o village - Chraiya Rahika Vijay Nagar
                  Chanka, P.S - Srinagar, District - Purnea

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sahja Nand Sharma
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms.Gulnar Begum
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-03-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.