Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rampravesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Rampravesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he voluntarily surrendered before the trial court. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that surrender and withdrawal were permissible. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after surrendering before the trial court

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • surrender
  • bail

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48000 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria
                  ======================================================
                  Rampravesh Yadav S/o Late Kamli Yadav R/o Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi,
                  Distt.- Khagaria

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms.Pronoti Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    23-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner, during pendency of the anticipatory bail application,

                    surrendered before the learned Trial Court, thus seeks

                    permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.