Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay sah @ Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail, subject to a bond of Rs 10,000, two sureties, and the conditions specified under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjay Sah, was implicated in an arms case (Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act) after police allegedly entered his house and he fled, discarding a pistol. He contended that no incriminating material was recovered from him or his residence and that he was falsely implicated. The petition sought bail, noting that he had not previously applied for anticipatory or regular bail and that he was already accused in four other cases. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the facts and the petitioner’s claim of innocence, allowed the bail petition, directing that bail be granted on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The order also stipulated cancellation of bail if the petitioner concealed additional criminal antecedents or made false statements regarding prior bail petitions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail pending arrest in a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 are applicable to the bail grant.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents and alleged false statements affect the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4817 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2025 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar, Son of Gawar Sah, Resident of Village-
                 Mathiya P.S.- Chhatauni Dist -East Champaran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :       Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the

                   petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with

                   Chhatauni          P.S. Case No.533 of 2025, dated-07.09.2025,

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a /

                   26 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per allegation, on secret information, police

                   came to the house of the Petitioner and seeing the police the

                   Petitioner is alleged to have started fleeing away throwing away

                   a pistol from his waist.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that no incriminating material has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4817 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered either from the possession of the Petitioner or from

          his house.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          petition that the petitioner has been made accused in four other

          cases.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his

          furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection

          with Chhatauni P.S. Case No.533 of 2025, subject to the

          conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.,

          2023 and on the following conditions:

                       (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4817 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      below that the petitioner has criminal antecedents other than the

                      disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of

                      the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the

                      petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his

                      knowledge of the same.

                                   (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                      below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                      learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                    (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.