Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond, sureties and continued maintenance payments.

Summary

Subhash Kumar, husband of Ganga Kumari, was arrested in connection with a FIR under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He had earlier filed a restitution of conjugal rights suit under the Hindu Marriage Act and was paying interim maintenance of Rs.3,000 per month as directed by the Family Court. The State alleged that Kumar had entered into a second marriage, causing hardship to his wife and children, and opposed his bail. The petitioner argued his bona‑fide intent to continue the marriage and offered to pay an additional Rs.2,000 for the children. The Patna High Court, applying Section 482(2) of the B.N.S., granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a condition to continue monthly payments of Rs.5,000 to the wife until the family court’s final order.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita despite serious allegations under the Dowry Prohibition Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s payment of maintenance and his claim of bona‑fide intent affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • maintenance
  • dowry prohibition
  • family law
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49136 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Subhash Kumar son of Mohit Paswan village- Ukhada P.S- Bishanpur
                 District-Darbhanga

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ganga Kumari Wife of Subhash Kumar village- Ukhada P.S- Bishanpur
                 District-Darbhanga At P/A- Resident in her father house namely pramod
                 Paswan Village- Bhauara Mahaseth Pokhar Ward No 43 Ps and Dist-
                 Madhubani

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Shivam Kumar, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   21-01-2026                  Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner, learned

                   Advocate for the informant and the learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner happens to be husband of the O.P.

                   No. 2 apprehends his arrest in connection with Madhubani

                   Mahila P.S. Case No. 39 of 2024, registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 82(1), 303(2) and

                   3(5) of the B.N.S and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition

                   Act.

                                3. Considering the nature of the dispute, as has arisen

                   on account of a matrimonial discord, the matter was referred to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49136 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/4




          the Patna High Court Mediation and Reconciliation Centre.

          However, the dispute could not be resolved and this matter has

          been listed before this Court again.

                       4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that

          prior to the institution of the present FIR, the petitioner had filed

          a Matrimonial Case No. 171 of 2023, under Section 9 of the

          Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal right and, as

          such, his bona fide was writ large, that he wanted to continue

          with the marriage but on the instigation made by some

          unscrupulous family members, the FIR has been instituted. It

          has also been apprised to this Court that one maintenance case

          has also been filed by the O.P. No. 2, and in pursuant to the

          direction of the Family Court, the petitioner has been paying

          interim maintenance to the tune of Rs. 3,000/- per month.

                       5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State

          and the informant while opposing the prayer for bail has

          submitted that the petitioner has already solemnized another

          marriage and this is the reason that O.P. No. 2 refused to reside

          with the petitioner. This fact cannot be denied that the couple

          blessed with two children and both the children are living with

          the O.P. No. 2, but because of any financial assistance, she is

          facing extreme hardship in nurturing her children.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49136 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            3/4




                       6. At this juncture, learned Advocate for the petitioner

          shown his bona fide and on request of this Court submits that he

          will also ensure payment of Rs. 2,000/-, besides interim

          maintenance, in the name of the children.

                       7. Having considered the submissions advanced by

          learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of

          the materials discussed hereinabove, this Court is acceded to the

          prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, let the petitioner

          above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

          from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          SDJM, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Mahila P.S.

          Case No. 39 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in

          Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

          with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the

          own/close family members of the petitioner.

                       8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall ensure

          payment of Rs. 3,000/- + Rs. 2,000/- in the bank account of the

          O.P. No. 2 in the last week of every month, till any final order is

          passed by the Family Court in the maintenance case.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49136 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                                        4/4




                                   9. It is expected that the petitioner shall stand on the

                      undertaking given before this Court, failing which appropriate

                      order shall be passed.



                                                  (Harish Kumar, J)
shivank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.