Patna High Court
JHAKURI YADAV @ JHAKHURI YADAV @ RAMDAYAL YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Jhakuri Yadav, filed an application seeking modification of an order dated 04-08-2023 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.38053 of 2023. The application was listed for hearing on 27-02-2026, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Despite repeated calls, the petitioner remained absent on the subsequent date of 16-03-2026. The State of Bihar was represented by learned Additional Public Prosecutor Satyendra Narayan Singh. The Court, noting the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the application, dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for a hearing seeking modification of a prior order?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- modification of order
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.496 of 2024
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38053 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-643 Year-2022 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya
======================================================
JHAKURI YADAV @ JHAKHURI YADAV @ RAMDAYAL YADAV SON
OF RAJESHWAR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BRIJHARA, POST
BHIMPUR, POLICE STATION KONCH, DISTRICT GAYA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR,
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 16-03-2026 The petitioner seeks modification of the order dated
04.08.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.38053 of 2023. The
modification application was heard on 27.02.2026 and no one
had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, in spite of
the repeated calls, no one has tendered appearance on behalf of
the petitioner. Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned APP is
present on behalf of the State.
2. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U
Checking your session…